Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#16-3877 <br /> November 15,2016 <br /> Page 8 of 8 <br /> 3. If the Planning Commission concludes that the variances as requested or in some <br /> other manner or configuration are justified, does the Commission find it <br /> necessary to impose additional conditions other than those proposed in order to <br /> mitigate the impacts if any created by the granting of the variances? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of the blanket average setback variance for each of Lots 1 <br /> through 7 as proposed, subject to the review conditions noted above. If Planning <br /> Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met and the variances are <br /> justified,then a recommendation for approval would be in order. <br /> It may be appropriate to consider a future amendment to the average setback ordinance that <br /> would exempt new lakeshore subdivisions from the average setback requirements under <br /> circumstances similar to those encountered with Mooney Lake Preserve. <br />