Laserfiche WebLink
Property Owners) Fire No./Parcel No. <br /> SxateIN Coe000nents (Please describe the system components and attach site sketch showing system location). <br /> 02, /00,0IbAv'tv yC S A_j <br /> What methods were used to matte the determinations for the comnliance inspection?(Note.No standard protocol exists <br /> The following list Is not exhaustive, or In sequential order nor indicates which combinations may necessary to make a determination) <br /> Watertight tank(s) Hydraulic Functioning Vertical Separation Distance <br /> ❑ Probed.tank bottom X_Searched for surface outlet Conducted soil borings <br /> ❑ Observed low liquid level ❑ Performed hydraulic test Depth to limiting layerf�e�0 t <br /> ❑ Examined const. records 0( Searched for seeping in yard Depth to system bottom 01ra a <br /> Ex meol emp (pumped)tank ❑ Checked for back-up in home t� Examined records <br /> ❑ P�outside t nkror"black soil" ❑ Excessive ponding in soil system/D-loxes ❑ LGU Limiting Layer Verification <br /> ❑ Pressure/vacuum check ❑ Homeowner testimony ❑ Other <br /> ❑ Other ❑ Examined for surging In tank <br /> ❑ "Black soil"above soil system <br /> ❑ Other <br /> Lased on the compliance criteria,the system status is., (check one) ❑ failing (to protect groundwater) ❑ an <br /> imminent threat to public health or safety(ITPHS), ❑ non-compliant(monitoring issue)9compliant(none of the 3 <br /> previous conditions). Therefore,this document is a: XCertificate of Compliance ❑ Notice of Noncompliance <br /> Ys this system an EPA Class V Injection Well? . ❑ yes no <br /> �erl»d�ca�l®a� <br /> I hereby certify as a state of Minnesota licensed Inspector and/or Designer I or Qualified Employee Inspector and/or Qualified Employee <br /> Designer I that I conducted an investigation that accurately determined the compliance status of this system and that my recorded <br /> observations are accurate as of this date. No determination of future hydraulic performance has been nor can be made due to <br /> unknown conditions during system construction, <br /> abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance,or future water usage. <br /> Altd%)Inspector's name(print) IKIR iiv el/ Phone 762- Y7?- 17j4D <br /> License and/or Registration Number Address &OX ej YB <br /> Employed by� J� Address,�p.t�t7b. �lrv� c����7 <br /> Signa e <br /> Date <br /> UllUlrade irements fdadved from Minnesota statutes§115.55) <br /> An ITPHS mustbe upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if <br /> required by local ordinance. If the system fails to provide sufficient groundwater protection, then the system must be upgraded, <br /> replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by rule or the local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as definer/In <br /> law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,replaced, or its use <br /> discontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that fs more strict. This does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, wellhead <br /> protection areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. <br /> Suggested Attachanents <br /> 1) Site sketch could also include: well,well setback to system, dwelling or other buildings,tank(s),reserved soil treatment area, <br /> surface water and soil boring locations. Include as-built drawing if available. <br /> 2) Soil boring logs,showing each horizon. Indicate the texture, color,redoximorphic features depth to bedrock,standing water and <br /> whether the material is fill. <br /> 3) A list of any and all requirements of the local ordinance that are different from the state requirements referred to on this form. <br /> 4) A homeowner survey of system performance,signed by the homeowner as being factual. { <br /> 5) Monitoring data as appropriate. <br /> Dana 7 of 7 <br />