Laserfiche WebLink
#LA18-00001 <br />February 20, 2018 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Public Comments <br />Neighbor comments were submitted showing support for the vacation. Staff also received verbal <br />concerns about the need to provide adequate turnaround options in the area but a written <br />comment was not submitted. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does this request meet the City Code and/or State Statue requirements for approval? <br />2. Would approving this action affect any utilities? <br />3. Are there any issues or concerns with this application? <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommend denial of this application because it does not meet the standards of the City <br />Code or State Statue. <br />If the Commission/ Council finds evidence for approval the city utilities in the area will need to be <br />addressed to stay protected; staff suggests a drive, utility access and maintenance easement be <br />required and recorded. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. <br />Area Map/ Site Plan <br />Exhibit B. <br />Utility Maps <br />Exhibit C. <br />Original Plat <br />Exhibit D. <br />Project Narrative <br />Exhibit E. <br />Comments received from the public <br />Exhibit F. <br />Property Owners List and Map <br />