Laserfiche WebLink
2015 Progress <br />Council Workshop <br />Exhibit A <br />No. <br />Summary <br />Issues/Discussion <br />Total Points <br />Notes/ Recent Action (11-4-16) <br />The definition of half story: "Half story means the uppermost floor of a building in which (i) the <br />intersection of the exterior wall and the roof is not more than three feet above the floor elevation, <br />and (ii) not more than 60 percent of the floor area within the exterior walls of the uppermost floor <br />23 <br />2016 HP <br />1/2 Story definition <br />exceeds five feet in height as measured from the floor to the rafters. Floors exceeding these <br />29 <br />Case number 16-3815 Completed <br />parameters shall be deemed a full story." is very confusing for the public to understand, causing a <br />lot of resubmittals and redesign of the house. The definition should be amended to make it easier <br />to understand. <br />The City should consider changes to ordinance standards and public street light policies which <br />2 <br />2016 HP <br />Dark Skies Standards <br />reduce ambient light emissions to reduce the impact of light pollution to the night sky in our rural <br />27 <br />Case Number 15-3784.4-11-16 Council tabled <br />residential lake culture setting <br />2016 HP <br />Accessory structures, including hot tubs and detached decks are required to be built 10 feet from a <br />23 <br />Completed. Case number 16-3809. Council <br />38 <br />Accessory Structures <br />house. This setback seems unnecessary. <br />approved 3-14-16 <br />The definition of "Existing ground level" means the elevation of the grade at the base of an existing <br />structure, measured at points abutting the foundation wall, or the existing grade of a vacant lot." is <br />30 <br />2016 HP <br />Existing Grade definition <br />not consistent with the current practice employed, which is the grade at the time of plat approval. <br />20 <br />Completed Case number 16-3817 <br />The goal is to avoid the artificially raising the grade to getting a higher house. Current practice <br />should be codified. <br />Section 78-98 (b) does not make sense and its applicability is questioned. It suggests a 6th month <br />33 <br />2016 HP <br />Notice of Hearing <br />window to acquire land. Further, why is the public notice 350 for CUP and 150 for variances? It <br />19 <br />Completed. Case number 16-3810. Council <br />approved 3-14-16 <br />may be more beneficial for the notice area be consistent. <br />28 <br />2016 MP <br />Boundary line adjustments <br />Lot line arrangements, boundary line adjustments, and other non -subdivisions that do not result in <br />18 <br />Case number 16-3824. Public hearing 4-18-16 <br />a new lot could be handled administratively, saving applicant, council and staff time. <br />PUD, RPUD & PRD contain overlaps in the code and are confusing; A easier to understand code may <br />5 <br />2016 MP <br />RPUD process ordinance revisions <br />18 <br />encourage more of these creative types of development. <br />We should review accessory dwelling units and how they apply to granny flats and similar housing <br />40 <br />2016 MP <br />Policy discussion <br />arrangements. <br />16 <br />Orono code language should be clarified to be consistent with state shore land standards with <br />15 <br />2016 MP <br />Existing substandard shore land lots <br />regard to minimum lot size and width vs. underlying zoning. Has been amended three times (Ord. <br />16 <br />of record <br />92, 95, and 108) <br />The sketch plan process is a requirement for class III subdivisions and may impact the 120 day <br />review period requirements. Additionally, the sketch plan process does not provide for feedback on <br />26 <br />2016 MP <br />Sketch Plan process <br />other types of applications where the process might be beneficial, such as ordinance amendments, <br />16 <br />Comp plan amendments, site plans. Making the sketch plan optional and an independent process <br />would alleviate both concerns. Should notification be added to the process? <br />Completed. Case number 38-3823 <br />