My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-2017 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
06-26-2017 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 3:14:24 PM
Creation date
3/2/2018 9:48:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, February 16, 2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Lemke noted Item No. 3 says that short-term rentals may be permitted at the owner's principal place of <br />residence only. Lemke noted one person at the workshop mentioned she had another property a few <br />doors away and that she does not live there. Lemke stated she also indicated that if she cannot rent it <br />would be a financial hardship. <br />Barnhart stated there was another gentleman who raised the some concern as well regarding a cabin on <br />Big Island. Barnhart staffed he understands their point but that the City needs to be careful to make sure <br />the neighborhood retains that residential character. Barnhart stated he looks at it as a situation similar to a <br />home occupation and that the person needs to live there to have a home occupation. Barnhart stated in his <br />opinion that was an important characteristic of this industry and that it needs to be their primary <br />residence. <br />Lemke stated he still has some concerns with that. Lemke noted the two off-street parking spaces do not <br />apply to the cabin on Big Island. Lemke stated the third item he had some concern with was the <br />requirement that the owner must be a neutral person and not any type of corporation or partnership. <br />Thiesse stated he would agree with that on the license. <br />Schoenzeit stated dictating who can apply for a permit is way out of bounds and that in his view the City <br />needs to accept that entity as the license applicant. Schoenzeit stated the reason why the property is <br />owned by a corporation could be because of a tax structure. Schoenzeit stated in his view it is a slippery <br />slope. <br />Barnhart stated it could be as simple as changing the language to say, the licensee shall be. <br />Thiesse noted Item No. 4 requires that the owner be available to respond to issues within 60 minutes to <br />complaints. Thiess stated no one at the workshop said they couldn't be there within 30 minutes and that <br />60 minutes is a long time to wait if someone is experiencing problems. <br />Schoenwit commented the City should be just as responsive to residents' concerns. <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.