06-26-2017 Council Work Session Packet

Home Browse Search

Section 2 —12 Bemuse we have no civil amenities all renters are required to take their garbage with them when they leave. A large garbage can with a plastic beg is provided as a collection receptacle for them to hag up the garbage for this function. Section 2 — 13 The owner is on the deed as the designated trustee of the family trust. Some other thoughts are that 81g Island historically has been a destination, whether it is families enjoying their cabins or when the Amusement park existed or as It was transformed Into the Veterans Camp people have always a it under a short term basis. Which leads to the question that since the Three Rlvers Park District has Jurisdiction over both the properties the County has bought up over the years as well as the Veteran's Camp property which the City of tarono now owns, how does this affect the Districts ability to if they so choose in the future to open the Veterans Camp or their other areas of the Island to camping for a fee, this would fail under short berm rental for all practical purposes. Would this ordinance conflict with that and who would be assigned to facilitate that, along with enforcement? I have newer seen any police representation from the Orono police force or the Three River Police force on the Island. The only representation that responds to scalls currently Is the Hennepin County sheriff Water Patrol which already has their hands full due to the activity on the water. How does this impact the Power Squadron Property, they essentially are collecting a tee from members which In turn are allowed to camp overnight an the property, how will this proposed amendment effect them in fairness to how the rest of the properties am affected. If a rented boat Is moored, anchored to or beached on the island and its occupants are staying overnight wouldn't that fall under this ordinance as well? How would that be enforced? We understand the Implications of having a short terra rental In neighborhoods with smaller lots that have had larger homes ctmstrudWreconstructed on them, has a higher level for the potential for neighboring properties to be concerned and thus contributing to the city's desire to regulate time activities Is Justified, I would like to ask that consideration be made to exempt the Island from this ordinance based upon the historical use and activities of the Island properties, with regard to the Items mentioned above and the ability to apply them equally to all the properties on the Island. Due to these historical, moment and possible pnq]ected uses in the future It would seem that an ettception would be suited for the Island properties. Thank you for consideration of these Issues as It applies to the current amendment proposal and the request to exempt the island properties form the proposal.