My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2017 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
1999-2016 Agenda Packets - work sessions
>
2017
>
01-23-2017 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 3:06:20 PM
Creation date
3/2/2018 9:42:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Of the 47 variances processed in 2016, approximately 10 included a structural coverage relief request. <br />The Code also regulates impervious surface through hardcover limitations. These limitations are also <br />based on a percentage of lot size, up to 2 acres, and are applied based on the proximity to the lakes. <br />The city is divided into 6 Tiers, ranging from 25% to 85% maximum hardcover, included an exempt tier, <br />with no hardcover limitations. <br />The Mayor has suggested that the structural coverage limitation be removed, allowing setbacks and <br />hardcover to regulate massing. If the Council supports this strategy, staff suggests that a maximum <br />percentage be applied to the "exempt" Tier, so that all hardcover regulations can be found in one place, <br />reducing the complexity of the city code for the user. <br />As an alternative to striking structural limitation, the Council could consider changes to the how <br />structural coverage is calculated, the minimum or maximum lot area where structural coverage is <br />applied, or the percentage of appropriate structural coverage. Staff seeks confirmation. <br />Special Events. Regulation of special events is not included in the zoning ordinance, and therefore does <br />not require a public hearing. Staff is proposing a public hearing in part due to the level of interest <br />generated last fall on the subject. <br />Staff understands the objective of an ordinance is to protect neighborhoods from "more than <br />occasional" private events that regardless if the produce income or not, can impact the enjoyment of <br />neighboring residential properties due to noise, traffic, trash, and other impacts. Further, the objective <br />of the ordinance is not to prohibit occasional parties, or to require a lengthy and cumbersome <br />permitting process. Staff seeks confirmation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.