Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 12, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />The property will be rezoned to RPUD and tied to the Stonebay development across the street to meet size <br />requirements. Staff anticipates a similar design palette to the Stonebay project. <br />The net development density based on 56 units on the 2.55 -acre parcel would be 21.9 units per acre. The <br />highest density anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan is high density residential at 10 to 15 units per <br />acre. The senior housing project to the east was approved at 20 units per acre. Density at this level will <br />help the City meet its work force housing and density goals established in the Comprehensive Plan and <br />could allow for lower densities elsewhere. <br />Seals asked what is meant by work force housing. <br />Barnhart stated work force housing is not defined in the City Code and that it is likely the people who will <br />be renting will be people who work in the area and perhaps do not have the ability to afford a large home. <br />Barnhart noted the developer is not requesting any subsidy and the City is not offering any. <br />Crosby asked what the rents will be. <br />Patch indicated the rents will be market rate, meaning that the one -bedroom apartments will probably rent <br />in the $1,100 to $1,300 range and the two-bedroom apartments will be between $1,400 to $1,600 per <br />month. <br />Walsh noted Staff has laid out five issues for discussion. Walsh asked whether the Council feels this site <br />should be rezoned to residential. <br />Printup stated one of the reasons it was zoned business was to help keep the density down. <br />Walsh stated higher density on this site would give the City more flexibility on other developments. <br />Walsh noted the Council approved lower density on the Orono Preserve development with the idea that <br />higher density could be built elsewhere. <br />Seals stated she does not believe the residents will want the higher density. <br />18. #184002 JOHN PATCH OB/O BERKSHIRE PARTNERS, 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY, <br />CONCEPT PLAN, APARTMENT BUILDING, 8:26 P.M. — 9:00 P.M. — Continued <br />Walsh noted there is basically the same density with the senior housing and that this building will stay at <br />the same height as Stonebay so it will not look out of place. <br />Dankey commented the density will also impact the school district. <br />Crosby asked what the ramifications are from the Metropolitan Council if they do not approve higher <br />density. <br />Barnhart stated the City will be submitting a Comprehensive Plan Update later this year and that it is a <br />possibility the Metropolitan Council will not approve that if the City does not meet its density and <br />affordable housing goals. Barnhart noted currently there is quite a bit of density in the Navarre area and <br />that higher density in the Navarre area is probably misplaced due to the traffic levels. Barnhart stated the <br />Page 13 of 22 <br />