Laserfiche WebLink
Page—L of <br /> SIDRPT Rev i oio9 <br /> BRAUN <br /> I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report <br /> City of Oho <br /> Report No.: Date of This Report: 44.51 to <br /> Project Name: b Ft&..t. SCMOCLP&LProject No.: B y 9-6 Z0CM I- <br /> Project Address: n�14w!;e fZ Atw5 Qt p��_ 2 <br /> f3a� b_ <br /> Client: LA. Client Project No.: <br /> Project Manager: T. VA0 A&I--- Temp/Weather: FARnXCU ILL ZO <br /> Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: <br /> ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases <br /> (weeriodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing <br /> ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement AKSoils <br /> Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ <br /> Description and location of work completed: 19�4–t&gc- GN6 P&yet'Rsxsyc _ CD.C-A ts-sr&CJER-: P62P <br /> 04 J;kDeZr '5�4,�a 6p) P–CAU45 A d5 ,P AQVA,•c� Fit &At Sat L-Cee2fe.�&n AaM.:' 0 94- <br /> D.C. =JA tCATE-5 Mh&E Qe.••.P 160 �PoP-7– &c– & _gAeE&r S S.rrMcx�c�_ <br /> Aim t 5eq-t Aaaei l Anew &e= 6&s& foie- An tfieWyl'(- <br /> 6X—MtlAn, ( ObS�u,4�rr�,s <br /> List tests performed: <br /> • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No.25, <br /> • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No <br /> CR- <br /> • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. <br /> To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable <br /> workmanship provision of the current IBC,except as noted above. <br /> Signed: Date: 96KI r0 <br /> Print Full Name: I.D. No.: COW <br /> White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. <br /> Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 <br />