Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> PC <br /> #18-3992 <br /> Exhibit F <br /> Laura Oakden <br /> From: Melanie Curtis <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 2:36 PM <br /> To: Laura Oakden;Jeremy Barnhart <br /> Subject: FW: Changes coming to Orono density <br /> FYI <br /> Melanie Curtis <br /> 952.249.4627 mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us <br /> Original Message <br /> From: Penny Saiki [mailto:pennysaiki@gmail.com] <br /> Sent:Wednesday, December 27, 2017 2:34 PM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis<MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: Fwd: Changes coming to Orono density <br /> Hi, Melanie- <br /> wanted to jump in my 2 cents for tonight's Planning Commission meeting. <br /> 1. It doesn't seem fair to vacate the fire lane by the Vogstrum property,so they can use it as theirs. <br /> I'd vote NO. <br /> (Also the people at the end of the Circle have installed an electric fence in the fire lane next to their property-so we can <br /> all drop our dogs there? ) <br /> 2.The builder could have moved the house forward street side or used a different layout to accommodate the deck <br /> within the setback, but they are going for the variance after the the house foundation and framing is in place. We have <br /> all lived by the rules,so it doesn't seem right to allow a builder the "I forgot"approach to zoning laws. In fact, it weakens <br /> all the zoning ordinances to allow that approach. <br /> I'd vote NO. <br /> 3. The subdivision of the Jundt's land is too bad, but if it falls in zoning parameters, I would think it OK if the developers <br /> pay the changes to the street and any utilitiy relocations or improvements. I don't know if it has been a policy of the <br /> past, but it also does not seem fair for the rest of us in Orono to subsidize redevelopment of a private property. <br /> I'd vote YES with those requirements stated upfront to the developers. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Best to you, <br /> Penny Saiki <br /> 2874 Casco Point Road <br /> Orono <br /> 1 <br />