Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 11, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />5. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO — AMEND CHAPTER 86 TO MODIFY SURVEY <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS — ORDINANCE <br />NO. 146 (continued) <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Walsh Opposed. <br />6. #15-3722 STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE <br />Senior Planner Gaffron stated at the April 27 meeting the Council provided some direction on this draft <br />ordinance regarding stormwater and drainage trunk fee. Staff did make the following changes pursuant to <br />that discussion: <br />Establishing a fee credit in the 2 -acre and 5 -acre zones for: <br />Acreage of newly -created wetland. <br />Acreage of stormwater ponding or similar improvements that provide additional treatment <br />benefits beyond what is required to treat the stormwater runoff from the development site. <br />Acreage of conservation easements resulting from Conservation Design process in both the <br />2 -acre and 5 -acre zones. <br />2. The perimeter buffer credit for the 5 -acre zone is removed. <br />The conversion to a per -lot fee basis for the 112 acre, 1 -acre, 2 -acre and 5 -acre zones caps the fee <br />at the zoning lot size dry -buildable minimum area. As a result, existing wetlands will no longer <br />be included in the chargeable area and therefore no fee credit is given for the existing wetlands. <br />It should be noted that because the multi -family and high-density residential fees remain on a gross per - <br />acre basis, the following credits would still be allowed: <br />• All wetland acreage up to the delineation line. <br />• Acreage of stormwater ponding or similar improvements that provide additional <br />treatment benefits beyond what is required to treat the stormwater runoff from the <br />development site. <br />• Acreage of conservation easements resulting from the Conservation Design process. <br />Gaffron stated the draft ordinance section for revising the Fee Schedule has been removed from the Fee <br />Ordinance and is attached as a separate Fee Schedule Ordinance for adoption. <br />Gaffron noted there is one correction on Exhibit A, the bottom of Page 3 under Item 7, relating to the <br />three characteristics for reduction. Gaffron stated those items should be underlined as well since it is new <br />language in the Code. The Council should review the draft and direct Staff as to any additional changes <br />desired. <br />Printup stated as it concerns redevelopment projects, he would be comfortable removing that and keeping <br />this ordinance specific to new development. <br />Levang indicated she is in agreement with Council Member Printup and that she is not prepared to <br />address redevelopment at this time but that it could be a later discussion. <br />Page 9 of 2S <br />