My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05-11-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2015 10:34:00 AM
Creation date
5/28/2015 10:33:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 11, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />5. ##15-3711 CITY OF ORONO — AMEND CHAPTER 86 TO MODIFY SURVEY <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS — ORDINANCE <br />NO. 146 (continued) <br />Staff has suggested the criteria in No. 4 as a response to the Council's direction. This language allows the <br />City Engineer to exempt the site plan or survey requirement prepared by a licensed professional if there is <br />an existing survey on file, if the project is smaller than 200 square feet, and if the project location exceeds <br />the minimum setback requirement. This exemption would be available to properties which are outside the <br />Shoreland Overlay and Stormwater Quality Districts and which exceed two acres in acre so that <br />hardcover and structural coverage limitations would not be a factor. <br />Staff recommends approval of the draft ordinance. The City Council should review and discuss the <br />proposed amendments. <br />McMillan asked what the Stormwater Quality Overlay District is. <br />Curtis indicated that is the City's hardcover zone. <br />McMillan asked if that dovetails with the Shoreland Overlay District. <br />Curtis stated that extends beyond the Shoreland Overlay District because it includes the RPUD as well as <br />the industrial district. <br />Printup stated he likes the fact that this ordinance is getting away from requiring a professional surveyor <br />on smaller projects to make it have a less financial impact. Printup stated what they are talking about here <br />and what he would like to see happen might be a conversation for another day, but that he would like to <br />build in more flexibility for the lots under two acres. <br />Curtis stated adding in more flexibility would require additional discussion to determine what the <br />Council's tolerance is for detailed surveys or what type of information the Council would be looking for. <br />Curtis noted with a small lot, there tends to be more impact to the neighbors, and the margin of error, such <br />as an encroachment, would have a bigger impact. <br />Printup stated in his view the Council should have that conversation. Printup stated someone approached <br />him the other day about what it would take to construct a 10' x 10' patio and that he did not have the <br />answer. <br />Council Member Walsh stated in his view this ordinance is a good place to start. Walsh stated the <br />Council should also know how many properties in Orono are less than two acres. As it relates to the <br />existing as -built survey, Walsh stated he would like to add language to the effect of, "or a plat that shows <br />the improvements that are on the property" since that would give the City pretty much the same thing. <br />Walsh stated he would also like to get rid of No. 4 and simply say, if it meets all these other items, which <br />would eliminate the acreage issue. <br />Walsh stated he also is not sure if 200 square feet is the right number and that he does not know how that <br />number was arrived at. Walsh stated he would like to look at a higher number to give some flexibility for <br />the smaller projects. <br />Page 6 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.