My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05-11-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2015 10:34:00 AM
Creation date
5/28/2015 10:33:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 11, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (continued) <br />Walsh indicated he also talked to some of the Crystal Bay Road residents and that he knows there are <br />some issues with the bump height and the number of bumps. Walsh stated Crystal Bay Road is a pretty <br />active drive-through for people going to the Lafayette Club or people cutting over to County Road 15. <br />Walsh stated there is also an issue with the speed signs since they are 15 miles an hour and the speed <br />bumps are designed for 20 miles. Walsh noted the Public Works Director has indicated there is nothing <br />that shows there should be a 15 mile -per -hour speed limit on that road. <br />Edwards stated he was talking about a couple of local traffic only signs that are not in the City's database <br />showing the City authorized those signs. Edwards stated it is a public road and that he is not sure how he <br />can maintain those signs limiting it to local traffic only. Edwards stated the speed bumps have a range of <br />15 to 20 miles an hour. <br />Walsh stated the residents would like additional speed humps installed if possible and that he will direct <br />the residents to contact the Public Works Director if they are interested in certain locations for adding <br />speed bumps. <br />Cornick stated over the past week he has received approximately half a dozen calls from residents. All <br />seven phone calls were in favor of the City passing the wellhead ordinance and that he has received no <br />negative feedback. Cornick stated those were the first seven phone calls he has received since being on <br />the Council and that in his view they were generated by the flyer that came out. <br />Cornick noted he also attended the Navarre Initiative meeting and that they are still moving forward with <br />their ideas. Cornick stated it is an excellent committee. <br />Levang stated she would like to read a public statement that she has developed regarding the flyer and <br />that she would like to be very specific about what she sees happening in Orono. <br />Levang read the following: "I find the flyer sent to citizens of Orono, and surrounding communities, to <br />be disrespectful. As an elected official, I accept that my vote will be scrutinized and even challenged. <br />This publication went far beyond the bounds of decency and, instead, discredited citizens, staff, <br />volunteers, and neighbors with its criticism. Our citizens and neighbors did not deserve to be treated so <br />irresponsibly and carelessly with sensationalized headlines and stories seeped in falsehoods. <br />I want to address the issues raised about transparency and the allegation that I voted against videotaping <br />the Planning Commission out of an unwillingness to be transparent. Nothing could be further from the <br />truth. I voted against this proposal because of essential differences in the roles of the Planning <br />Commission and City Council. <br />Planning Commissioners are unpaid volunteers. They are appointed by the City Council and serve as <br />advisors to us. The votes they make are advisory only. Every application they process comes to the City <br />Council for continued study and, ultimately, for a final vote. On the other hand, City Council members <br />are elected officials. We run for office and are elected based on citizen votes. We are paid. Every <br />application we process comes to us with a recommendation by the Planning Commission. Sometimes <br />those recommendations are upheld, at other times they are not. I also take offense at the ungrateful <br />attitude this flyer showed to our Planning Commissioners who work tirelessly as volunteers for the City. <br />Page 20 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.