Laserfiche WebLink
Saturated <br /> IV Seasonally Inundated Or <12.5- Wetland <br /> Saturated 25% <br /> Many areas having these <br /> Irregularly Inundated or >5-12Wetland(if hydrophytic veg. and hydric <br /> V Saturated .5% hydrologic characteristics soils also present <br /> are not wetlands <br /> Intermittently Or Never Areas with these <br /> VI Inundated Or Saturated <5% hydrologic characteristics Not <br /> are not wetlands <br /> The definition of appropriate hydrology according to the 1987 Manual includes two important terms <br /> that must be clarified. First,the definition of a growing season is needed. The growing season is <br /> defined in the 1987 Manual as: "...the portion of the year when soil temperature (measured 19.7 <br /> inches below the surface)is above biological zero(5°C or 41'F)." According to the 1987 Manual <br /> this period of time can be approximated by using the "starting and ending dates for the growing <br /> season based on a 28° F air temperature threshold at a frequency of 5 years in 10." Based on this <br /> definition the growing season ranges approximately 160 days to 180 days in the Minneapolis/St.Paul <br /> metropolitan area(160 in the northern suburbs and greater to the south). Therefore, the required <br /> inundation or saturation to the surface for 5% of the growing season would be 8 or 9 consecutive <br /> days that ground water would need to be at the surface or saturated to the surface. <br /> The second term in the appropriate hydrology definition from the above paragraph to be clarified is <br /> "in most years". This means in 5 of 10 years hydrology must exist within a"jurisdictional wetland" <br /> for the 8 or 9 consecutive days of the growing season. This means that one observation date or even <br /> one whole year worth of detailed hydrology data may be deemed insufficient to determine if <br /> appropriate hydrology exists at a given location. In the event that precipitation events accumulate to <br /> above or below normal during just prior to a site visit or during a more intensive hydrology study,the <br /> data may be confounded by non-normal circumstances and may be considered outside the bounds of <br /> "most years". Ideally,both antecedent soil moisture conditions and precipitation would be normal <br /> during all delineations. However, this is not a realistic impression of climate. Therefore,primary <br /> indicators of hydrology must be reviewed with scrutiny prior to determining if hydrology indeed <br /> exists. <br /> Wetland hydrology may be observed as standing water (inundation), or may be observed as <br /> freestanding water within a soil pit or auger hole (saturation) usually within the upper 12 inches. <br /> This is what would be considered primary hydrology indicators. Examination of this indicator <br /> requires digging a soil pit to a depth of 16 inches and observing the level at which water stands after <br /> sufficient time has been allowed for water to drain into the hole. The required time will vary <br /> depending on soil texture. This level represents the depth to the water table;the depth to saturated <br /> soils will always be nearer the surface due to the capillary fringe. According to the Hydrology <br /> criteria in the 1987 Delineation Manual,for soil saturation to impact vegetation,it must occur within <br /> a major portion of the root zone, typically within 12 inches of the surface. Only one primary <br /> indicator is necessary to make the determination that wetland hydrology is present. However,since a <br /> single observation is not enough evidence, based on the percentage of the growing season this <br /> inundation or saturation is required,these data are only valid when reviewed while also considering <br /> the abundance of recent precipitation events or the seasonal trend of climate when the site visit was <br /> 3 <br /> Svoboda Ecological Resources 531 North Stream Road <br /> Project No.2005-309-03 Gronberg and Associates <br />