Laserfiche WebLink
MILLS CONSTRUCTION LLC <br />Property located in Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, <br />Hennepin County, Minnesota. <br />Property Address: 990 North Shore Drive W, Orono, MN <br />PID No. 0 1- 117-23-22-0018 <br />Benchmark: Center line of North Shore Drive opposite <br />south line. <br />Elevation = 1006.0 feet <br />990.6 <br />X <br />993.8 <br />Mt pi <br />993.8 <br />997.0 - <br />the <br />Established in 1962 <br />LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. <br />LAND SURVEYORS <br />REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE Oh MINNESOTA <br />7601 73rd Avenue North (763)560-3093 <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Fax No. 560-3522 <br />uruPIJars Q'I r r-1 ifir�I <br />HARDCOVER CALCULATIOA15 <br />Denotes Existing Contour <br />Proposed Bulldmq <br />- 5362 5q. ft <br />x000.0 <br />Deck $ Pat/o <br />- l 60 5q. ft <br />Denotes Proposed Elevation <br />Reta/l7117q w9115 <br />- 57 5q. ft <br />Basis for <br />Proposed Drveway <br />- 5903 Sq. ft <br />bearings is <br />Proposed Wal,'- <br />- l 02 5q, ft <br />assumed <br />Total Hardcover:, - <br />l / 584 5q. ft <br />grading plan before excavation and construction. <br />Area of Lot <br />= 87269 Sq, ft <br />/ <br />Percentage of 1-ardcover = 13.3% <br />1 III I <br />drainage, grading and/or development plans. <br />NOTE: <br />C OF"O <br />elevations to be verified by builder. <br />SITE PLAN GRADING KAN <br />Proposed Top of Block <br />1023.0 <br />Q APPROVED <br />99' ' <br />l -SLOT <br />bra <br />APPROVED WITH R ISIONS <br />onoxo Corr <br />INVOICE NO. 80386 <br />F. B. NO. 1056-62 <br />SCALE: 1" = 30' <br />• Denotes Found Iron Monument <br />O Denotes Iron Monument <br />7] Denotes Wood Hub Set for <br />excavation only <br />-' - - <br />Denotes Existing Contour <br />' /� <br />retaining wall <br />Denotes Proposed Contour <br />x000.0 <br />Denotes Existing Elevation <br />000.0 <br />Denotes Proposed Elevation <br />wollf- <br />Denotes Surface Drainage <br />NOTE: <br />Proposed grades are subject to results of soil <br />tests. <br />Proposed building information must be checked <br />, \ I - <br />with approved building plan and development or <br />I <br />grading plan before excavation and construction. <br />Proposed grades shown on this survey are <br />/ <br />interpolations of proposed contours from the <br />1 III I <br />drainage, grading and/or development plans. <br />NOTE: <br />The relationship between proposed floor <br />elevations to be verified by builder. <br />1023.5 <br />Proposed Top of Block <br />1023.0 <br />Proposed Garage Floor <br />1014.5 <br />Proposed Lowest Floor <br />11005.5 N 89036'32" <br />Type: of Building <br />/ Lf) <br />Fullba5ement Walkout <br />y me <br />garage floor <br />99/4 Nc.799/5 / BY <br />gravel drivewayY,`y\.\\\V '/ DATE qS� ' ' <br />J.6 <br />93 / <br />- 9/.6 <br />\ N <br />X/7 ., X 1004. <br />the 8932 <br />E 366.94 _ <br />993. E - -' ,' 1010.9 <br />r - <br />r--------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/----- / ' <br />�x-� _ i ------------ I ----- - i-------------� / / 1 <br />x x--z--x- � � , , - - - - - - <br />=x -x -x -x -x_x -�I� �' x o;-x--.-x�x�X�x_x_ / <br />9� 000 <br />0 0 2' X -x-x Draln��e ' <br />I�-y----- I -x-x <br />I -- x / <br />10 006 -x�X� Sltility Ea5er�erlt I t o <br />-- 1010/ �X\ \X \ <br />� X 0 <br />\ �k\X 997. , / 1 e y x 0\ <br />96.6 - \ �/ \ �x / / 1007 <br />/ <br />00 <br />(19 <br />/02/. �I <br />1 00 I --- \ ,-�'•. }'�� /�� � Mesat l o "l s ��,�' M <br />SILT FENCE, 1OR v N <br />N, EROSION CONTROL <br />eedetail)q I 0 <br />TOT,5PlKE�/d- <br />V , <br />// x / / 0/5.02 ospto... $. .1023.731 j O <br />- - - - - <br />14 l 1 nate \ > / + 9 30'T2/. 0 /U) <br />l CP I I Iter tJnd \ ., \ / Ti'v /0/15.0 <br />I A (x/10 + / BIW ( 014.0 , 1010'. free l 2" <br />oy \ I tic <br />edge of trees pl -o <br />N II -1023.4-- __- <br />j 101 II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :� } / ' <br />U I G l0/,0.9 / xI <br />l� <br />J I ill I '. <br />US <br />N 1 // PropO�s'ed - - - 8'0_ Q23.4 0.5 <br />�� Re�fdence I p2�- <br />gutter flow / 6 <br />direction / _ /, IO2 <br />v/ I <br />52.6 180" / I 026.4/ - - - - - - - - - - <br />I-! - <br />1 I LO- / / - L----- / �- / , <br />/ 2 x <br />/I'_ 102 / .8 / / 1023. / <br />rflitlaryoorij , - ' ' /022. / / / I <br />x <br />N / <br />I v x / e✓I�lc '" ' x /control point `� /TOP SPIKE ��// t o <br />1016.00 ,' 1018.87 15.00 28'0'i <br />1004.0x\ I Q3.5 ////I 216.5 - 2 .3 Owl............% ...........................'% 1� <br />-- -�-- down 0 <br />fCJT5.7 X / 102 /. / �i_-.---- -'�� i e / 1028.50 /i ' <br />spout / 102/ lo- <br />l 006.0 - - <br />Rev <br />7-13-12 <br />Et -1-1 fb 105662i nv80386.dwg <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br />l 007, 5 <br />Graded Area <br />X10/8.4 <br />' <br />Io26 102 2 / <br />1 1022 <br />02A / \0 <br />' <br />1027.2 <br />O� <br />Post Spacing 4 feet <br />(typical) <br />v <br />Exerting Grade <br />SILT FENCE DETAIL <br />Drawn By Ogg <br />ile Name <br />Et -1-1 fb 105662inv80386.dwg <br />---xx--- DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE <br />- RETAINING WALL HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE TO BE A MAX. OF 4 FEET. AS PER THIS PLAN. <br />- GRADING LIMITS ARE DEFINED BY PROPOSED CONTOURS. <br />- ALL AREAS WITHIN GRADING LIMITS SHALL BE SPRING TOOTH TILLED TO A <br />UNIFORM DEPTH OF 10 INCHES, FINISH GRADED AND SODDED AS PART OF THE <br />LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. <br />- GRADING LIMITS SHALL BE DEFINED ON SITE BY A SILT FENCE INSTALLATION TO <br />CODE OR SPECIFIC REQUIRMENTS AS DEFINEC BY THE CITY OF ORONO. TYPICAL <br />INSTALLATION, STATIC SLICING METHOD, SEE DETAIL. <br />PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN: <br />- ALL AREAS WITHIN GRADING LIMITS SHALL AS NECESSARY HAVE EXISTING TOPSOIL <br />REMOVED AND STOCKPILED ON SITE. FINAL GRADE SHALL INCORPORATE EXISTING <br />STOCK PILED TOPSOIL AND ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL AND ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL AS <br />NEEDED TO PROVIDE A MINIMIUN TOPSOIL DEPTH OF 4 INCHES OVER THE ENTIRE <br />GRADED AREA. <br />- ALL AREAS WITHIN THE GRADING LIMITS OUTSIDE OF LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE <br />SODDED. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL HAVE EDGING AND DECORATIVE STONE OR <br />CYPRESS MULICH. <br />cfty of 0 <br />Planning & Zoning Pian ,Phwiew <br />�Ite Plan Review ©ate: l <br />Q APPROVED WITH .REVISIONS (sen notes) <br />�o <br />Ste: <br />Lot 1, Block 1, ENGLUND THIRD ADDI T iOITNT <br />Hennepin County, Minnesota <br />The only easements shown are from plats of record or information <br />provided by client. <br />I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or <br />under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed land <br />Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. <br />Surveyed this 11th day of January 2012 <br />Signed11 <br />Grego R Pras h, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 <br />U <br />' /� <br />retaining wall <br />/ �� <br />I,- -------•�-•� <br />+� I <br />�/' <br />\0\ <br />ash 24° ,H---►� <br />, \ I - <br />- <br />I <br />I I I O/ 5 � / <br />/ 1026.8 b <br />0 <br />/ <br />1 III I <br />x <br />I-- ----- <br />-x -x- / x x -x �`- <br />/ <br />-x-x4-x x -x x-x-x-x-x-x-x� / <br />I <br />/ <br />I 1 <br />, - - - J- - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - <br />/ / /.4 /----------- <br />- - / i <br />11005.5 N 89036'32" <br />1%V 366 4/1 <br />/ Lf) <br />' ! 033.8 <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br />l 007, 5 <br />Graded Area <br />X10/8.4 <br />' <br />Io26 102 2 / <br />1 1022 <br />02A / \0 <br />' <br />1027.2 <br />O� <br />Post Spacing 4 feet <br />(typical) <br />v <br />Exerting Grade <br />SILT FENCE DETAIL <br />Drawn By Ogg <br />ile Name <br />Et -1-1 fb 105662inv80386.dwg <br />---xx--- DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE <br />- RETAINING WALL HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE TO BE A MAX. OF 4 FEET. AS PER THIS PLAN. <br />- GRADING LIMITS ARE DEFINED BY PROPOSED CONTOURS. <br />- ALL AREAS WITHIN GRADING LIMITS SHALL BE SPRING TOOTH TILLED TO A <br />UNIFORM DEPTH OF 10 INCHES, FINISH GRADED AND SODDED AS PART OF THE <br />LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. <br />- GRADING LIMITS SHALL BE DEFINED ON SITE BY A SILT FENCE INSTALLATION TO <br />CODE OR SPECIFIC REQUIRMENTS AS DEFINEC BY THE CITY OF ORONO. TYPICAL <br />INSTALLATION, STATIC SLICING METHOD, SEE DETAIL. <br />PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN: <br />- ALL AREAS WITHIN GRADING LIMITS SHALL AS NECESSARY HAVE EXISTING TOPSOIL <br />REMOVED AND STOCKPILED ON SITE. FINAL GRADE SHALL INCORPORATE EXISTING <br />STOCK PILED TOPSOIL AND ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL AND ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL AS <br />NEEDED TO PROVIDE A MINIMIUN TOPSOIL DEPTH OF 4 INCHES OVER THE ENTIRE <br />GRADED AREA. <br />- ALL AREAS WITHIN THE GRADING LIMITS OUTSIDE OF LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE <br />SODDED. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL HAVE EDGING AND DECORATIVE STONE OR <br />CYPRESS MULICH. <br />cfty of 0 <br />Planning & Zoning Pian ,Phwiew <br />�Ite Plan Review ©ate: l <br />Q APPROVED WITH .REVISIONS (sen notes) <br />�o <br />Ste: <br />Lot 1, Block 1, ENGLUND THIRD ADDI T iOITNT <br />Hennepin County, Minnesota <br />The only easements shown are from plats of record or information <br />provided by client. <br />I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or <br />under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed land <br />Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. <br />Surveyed this 11th day of January 2012 <br />Signed11 <br />Grego R Pras h, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 <br />U <br />