My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
11-20-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2018 8:40:00 AM
Creation date
2/9/2018 8:39:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�, ', <br /> , , , t,... ,A.011,/,.„ <br /> , L , „ <br /> .,, ‘ ?A <br /> ION <br /> r <br /> 1 r <br /> - <br /> 4,000,40, <br /> i. moi. >Mt+i ; • <br /> iti+ <br /> 41, <br /> tea....:4 "mom. f , ' .. <br /> a "fir_ f+� r <br /> • <br /> ,,,,4,.. , 40 • „14 1144i‘0 , ' , „ilk ,1-4. -. ' 1 " ' - ' - ilk_ <br /> • <br /> r * • _ i'• , ., r i`' '''P,.. .�a y 4,• 10. <br /> In short,as homeowners,we would always prefer that we don't have to file for such variances and <br /> simply comply fully with established code. Also, we would have preferred the garage to be further away <br /> from the main dwelling as well. The modifications that would will be required to the structure to leave <br /> as-is (e.g.,shorter roof overhangs) are not desirable to us. However, we realize that the builder really <br /> had no logical alternatives given the site-specific considerations of this property. We support them and <br /> the decision they had to make. Happy to provide any additional information or answer any questions as <br /> required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.