My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
11-20-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2018 8:40:00 AM
Creation date
2/9/2018 8:39:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' ,,' ' ''',4 , ,-;,:,:', l'''s',,,'c-,,‘ i :.4%V ' i.. ,i t <br /> -��. � / X',\` ,till' Q / 4 /wit` w��, may/^ / <br /> r �a , '4 '�l� .. ',«:•,� ,•,r� -.':ilk: <br /> � i tit,- <br /> ., , f � • ; <br /> , '4 � firf4r iqi <br /> + k r <br /> r�yV,ii,' +tom <br /> 4 <br /> Zr ` Y <br /> 4i.r'`i'•'.'0 <br /> Y <br /> ty yNe V$;.• -'M1'� . <br /> . .. .,vit t.ivtir, � . <br /> i, <br /> ' 4` +fir,T`, <br /> 'fit i 3! i �F <br /> ,n. <br /> Practical Difficulty Response#8 <br /> "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or <br /> immediate adjoining property" <br /> The challenge of building a structure on this plot of land with the contour gradients described in#2 <br /> above, is finding a structural design that will fit the existing space. The structure had to be designed in a <br /> non-traditional manner to make it fit the existing, unique space. The workable design involved two <br /> separate sections with access from two different sides of the garage(an upper section and lower <br /> section). The lower section is side-loading and will allow for small recreational vehicles, mowers, and <br /> other similar items to be stored. The upper sections will allow for the garage to both be functional and <br /> look normal from the front of the property(south or water side). The key is that the garage height had <br /> to be increased so that it would fit appropriately within the roof line of the main dwelling. If the upper <br /> section was not added,the garage roof would have sit well below the roofline of the main dwelling, and <br /> would not fit aesthetically or functionally on the property(the roof would have been on the same <br /> elevation as the main dwelling access door). From the following picture,you can see that the opening in <br /> the upper section of the garage is designed to be on the same elevation as the side access door on the <br /> main dwelling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.