My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
10-16-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 2:26:54 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 2:25:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#17-3976 <br /> 10/16/2017 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> Staff has completed a preliminary review of the project for compatibility with the septic system. <br /> The attached letter from the Building Official provides additional information as Exhibit F. <br /> Practical Difficulties Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis <br /> Staff finds practical difficulties exist with the topography of the lot and the orientation of the <br /> existing home. The existing home is built at the tallest elevation on the lot. The topography then <br /> slopes down and away from the principle structure on all sides creating many slopes and hills on <br /> the property. The home also has the septic and a wetland to the east and their well to the west <br /> of the principle structure. The addition would create a 15 foot setback from the rear property <br /> line. The encroachment does not appear to adversely impact the adjacent properties. <br /> Engineer Comments <br /> A full review will be conducted at the time of the building permit. <br /> Public Comments <br /> To date, no public comments have been received. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the requested rear yard variance. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br /> Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br /> Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations <br /> Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br /> Exhibit F. Photos <br /> Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map <br /> Exhibit H. Septic preliminary analysis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.