10-16-2017 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

FILE#17-3972 October 16,2017 Page 5 of 5 Building Inspector Comments An email attach for your review noted additional construction requirements for a structure within 5 feet of a property line. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. A cursory review of height was done but elevations were not provided to verify the height of the proposed garage compared to the existing garage. Commissioners may want to clarify this point with the applicant to determine if there will be a large visual impact with the proposed new structure.The maximum height allowed is 30' and cannot exceed the height of the principle structure. 2. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Commission Options for Consideration 1. The Planning Commission may approve the some or all of the variance applications. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the variances, the Commission should provide their findings and practical difficulty analysis supporting the approvals; or 2. The Planning Commission could deny one or more variances;or 3. The Commission could approve the side setback,rear setback,and the hardcover variance but suggest the applicant to revise the plan to work within the 20%structural coverage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Photos Exhibit G. Building Inspector's Email Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map