Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#17-3970 <br /> 16 Oct 2017 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> and create a driving path for ATVs is partially self-created.The tree removal on the lake slope and the <br /> grading were done without City permits. The applicant was directed to provide a detailed restoration plan, <br /> some of which may be addressed on the landscape plan, however the proposed lakeshore retaining walls <br /> are not supported by practical difficulty. <br /> Public Comments <br /> Comments were received primarily pertaining to and attached to File#17-3947. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property <br /> in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential <br /> character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts <br /> created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> The applicant has provided a practical difficulties analysis. Planning Commission should review the <br /> application and the submitted information and determine if there are practical difficulties supporting the <br /> average lakeshore setback, lake setback, and hardcover variances for the home addition and lakeshore <br /> improvements requested by the applicant. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation <br /> Exhibit C. Existing Survey <br /> Exhibit D. Proposed Site Plan <br /> Exhibit E. Proposed Landscape Plans <br /> Exhibit F. Proposed House Plans and Elevations <br /> Exhibit G. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br /> Exhibit H. Aerial Photos <br /> Exhibit I. Site Photos <br /> Exhibit J. Property Owners List& Map <br />