Laserfiche WebLink
172. Name: Evie engler on 2017-06-13 00:04:33 <br /> Comments: <br /> 173. Name: John Shedon on 2017-06-13 01:35:43 <br /> Comments: <br /> 174. Name: Deborah Butler on 2017-06-13 01:38:06 <br /> Comments: <br /> 175. Name: John Motzko on 2017-06-13 02:53:55 <br /> Comments: <br /> 176. Name: Jamie on 2017-06-13 03:11:50 <br /> Comments: <br /> 177. Name: Jeff Baumer on 2017-06-13 03:51:51 <br /> Comments: I'd like to see a building that would have less impact on the already heavy <br /> traffic. <br /> 178. Name: Mary Mueller on 2017-06-13 13:45:14 <br /> Comments: It is not only traffic, it is the impact upon the wetland area, which is precious <br /> to our region. This is one of the last wooded areas adjacent to the freshwater wetlands <br /> lets hold on to it. <br /> 179. Name: Martha Mayer on 2017-06-13 14:08:21 <br /> Comments: <br /> 180. Name: Dick Adams on 2017-06-13 15:59:58 <br /> Comments: I am strongly opposed to the proposed development. We do not have the <br /> road capacity for the project, it would impact the charm of the area, and it is not in <br /> keeping with the comprehensive plan of the City of Orono. <br /> 181. Name: Curt Holt on 2017-06-13 17:05:31 <br /> Comments: I oppose this development as described. In addition to increasing traffic on <br /> already congested local roads, this project is simply too large and not in scale with the <br /> neighborhood. It would also adversely affect the adjacent wetland and the natural flow of <br /> water into Lake Minnetonka. <br /> 182. Name: James Brisley on 2017-06-13 19:12:20 <br /> Comments: <br /> 183. Name: Bill Boudewyns on 2017-06-13 19:33:02 <br /> Page 17 of 18 <br />