06-19-2017 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

27. Name: Jessica Withrow on 2017-06-02 17:39:41 Comments: 28. Name: Sheila on 2017-06-02 18:26:12 Comments: 29. Name: Robin Dodson on 2017-06-02 18:26:48 Comments: Developer needs to work within the zoning and ordinances already in place. They are there for a reason. Deny the variance request. 30. Name: Greg Hayhurst on 2017-06-02 19:01:51 Comments: While I would usually support a project like this, this one makes no sense based on the location, size and impact to the community. Traffic on 19 heading north during rush hour is already a joke. Accidents trying to turn left onto 19 for cross streets is increasing and this will only add to the problem. I could maybe support it if access could be off of county 15 via the road on the other side of the marsh -- but I am sure those neighbors would be pissed. I know I would. All in all, bad idea. 31. Name: Brent Reid on 2017-06-02 19:05:40 Comments: 32. Name: Gayle Hayhurst on 2017-06-02 19:07:22 Comments: This is a terrible idea and will permanently and negatively damage the neighborhoods. Traffic on 19 is already a huge problem during morning and evening rush hour. I don't know how it can accommodate 100 more cars. I worry about the wildlife in the marsh and we should seek to preserve our shrinking wild areas! 33. Name: Jacqueline Sherman on 2017-06-02 19:14:45 Comments: This project is too big for this location. 34. Name: Sandra Keegan on 2017-06-02 19:19:33 Comments: This area is not suitable for this type of development with all the wetlands right there. 35. Name: Kyle Klossner on 2017-06-02 19:27:55 Comments: 36. Name: Bridgette Olson on 2017-06-02 19:30:05 Comments: 37. Name: Linda L Eckland on 2017-06-02 19:35:41 Comments: Traffic is already congested at the intersection of 15 & 19, especially mornings and evenings. The impact on the wetlands and habitat would be devastating! Page 5 of 18