My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
06-19-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 10:48:13 AM
Creation date
2/8/2018 10:44:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Urban Planning Policy 1 —Future urban development will be <br /> carefully integrated into the existing neighborhoods. No new devel- <br /> opment will be permitted to conflict with or adversely affect the es- <br /> tablished neighborhood character.9 <br /> • Urban Planning Policy 4—Urban developments will be carefully <br /> screened for environmental sensitivity.Most of Orono's urban <br /> neighborhoods are located very close to Lake Minnetonka; <br /> therefore,any urban development has the potential for direct <br /> adverse impact on the lake. Storm water runoff control,erosion <br /> and sedimentation are particular concerns requiring careful de- <br /> sign attention in all new urban developments. In addition,par- <br /> ticular care will be taken to preserve open spaces,wooded areas and <br /> solar access.10 <br /> • Urban Planning Policy 5—Urban developments will be limited to <br /> the extent that they can be adequately served by the existing or <br /> planned public facilities and services.New development will not be <br /> permitted to exceed the existing or planned capacity of local roads, <br /> utilities,parks,police and fire protection." <br /> Application of Guiding Principles and Vision to Proposed Project <br /> Impact on Traffic/Pedestrians—The proposed building and its impact on <br /> an already difficult and dangerous traffic and pedestrian situation di- <br /> rectly conflict with the CMP's principles and findings. <br /> Attached as Exhibit B are the results of a petition circulated by foot and <br /> online among Navarre residents. Over 160 individuals signed the peti- <br /> tion,objecting to the proposed building. Without prompting or encour- <br /> agement,over 50 people responding to the online survey described key <br /> objections. They nearly all focused on the size of the proposed building. <br /> Thirty of these specifically named traffic as a concern with the project. <br /> For example: <br /> - Way to big and too many units for such a small area. Congested <br /> area,brings more congestion. I strongly oppose this project. <br /> 9 CMP page 2-17. <br /> 10 CMP page 2-18. <br /> 11 CMP page 2-18. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.