My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 2:22:29 PM
Creation date
2/6/2018 2:21:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 17,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> adjoining residence,will likely be extreme. Applicant should be asked to address how these <br /> issues and impacts will be mitigated. <br /> 4. Does the Planning Commission have any concerns regarding the lot layouts and front-lot/back-lot <br /> configuration? The proposed house location on Lot 2 will require re-designation of yards in order <br /> to have a southerly setback less than 45 feet. As shown,the setback from that south line is ten <br /> feet and Staff would suggest that 15 feet be required per the back lot code if that is considered as <br /> a side yard. <br /> 5. Does the Planning Commission agree that the average lakeshore setback can be established at <br /> seventy-five feet from the lake for both Lots 1 and 2 as part of the replatting approval?? <br /> 6. Applicants should address possible stormwater management practices and facilities to be <br /> employed both during construction and on a permanent basis. <br /> 7. As part of the preliminary plat review process,comments will be requested from the public <br /> Works,Police and Fire Departments as to the impacts of development of this property over the <br /> short term and long term. <br /> Gaffron stated the goal of the sketch plan is to provide the developer with an overview of the pertinent <br /> City ordinances and how they affect the proposal. <br /> Thiesse asked if that is a nonconforming cul-de-sac as it relates to length. <br /> Gaffron indicated he has not checked the length of the existing road to see if it meets City standards. It <br /> has been in existence since before the standard existed. <br /> Thiesse asked if a conditional use permit for fill is being requested. <br /> Gaffron stated it is likely additional such approvals will be required when a preliminary plat application is <br /> submitted. <br /> Page 48 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.