My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 2:22:29 PM
Creation date
2/6/2018 2:21:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 17,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Gaffron stated the City Attorney has advised that the city cannot issue a permit since it is state land and <br /> that Orono does not have permitting authority over state land. Gaffron indicated the City can enforce <br /> certain performance standards on the operation such as times of operation,but that it is difficult to <br /> regulate the operatio since it will occur on state land. <br /> Engleman stated in his view there are things that can be done but they cannot be done immediately. <br /> Gaffron stated he understands Mr. Engleman had a conversation with the City Administrator today who <br /> has told him basically the same thing. <br /> Engleman asked how the state can move in if it is zoned 2-acre residential. <br /> Gaffron stated the state trumps city zoning. <br /> Engleman stated in regards to the letter from the Dumases,they will have a bigger problem now than with <br /> Lake West since the equipment will be closer to them. <br /> Thiesse stated unfortunately the City's hands are tied. <br /> Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated in concept an interim use permit can be a tool for the City. Leskinen noted when the <br /> Planning Commission discussed this a long time ago and to her recollection there were some cautionary <br /> tales. Leskinen stated the City would have to be very diligent about it and that she is concerned there are <br /> uses that can either be inappropriate and hard to get rid of or may do irreparable damage to the site. <br /> Leskinen indicated she is open to the idea but that she does have some reservations. <br /> Landgraver indicated he is in favor of it since it is another tool in the City's toolbox. Currently the only <br /> tool the City has is a conditional use permit,which goes with the land and is permanent, and the interim <br /> use permit only goes for a certain time period. Landgraver stated it would force the City to be disciplined <br /> and make sure all the T's are crossed. <br /> Page 17 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.