My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
03-20-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2018 1:46:52 PM
Creation date
2/5/2018 1:45:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#17-3909 <br /> March 20,2017 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> The new home with a full story above the garage will increase the livability of the property while <br /> not adding to hardcover nor to the structural coverage percentage.The new home is not increasing <br /> hardcover, and structural coverage is well below the limit for this site. The close proximity to the <br /> lakeshore as well as the substandard setback to the street are clearly a function of the lack of lot <br /> depth from the street to the lake, and this factor is shared by the two adjacent homes to the <br /> immediate south. Planning Commission should consider whether there is a need to provide <br /> screening from the lake for the new residence, due to the limited lake setback; will the existing <br /> trees be saved? Staff would note that the house across the street sits significantly higher than <br /> applicants' house,so that lake views enjoyed by that off-lake owner(views which are not protected <br /> by code)will be minimally affected. <br /> Practical Difficulties Statement <br /> Applicant has submitted a Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit E, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Neighbor Comments <br /> The City has received no comments as of this writing. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. If the Planning Commission concludes that the variances as requested are justified, <br /> does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate any <br /> impacts created by the granting of the variances? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of the requested variances. If Planning Commission determines that <br /> the practical difficulties test is met,then a recommendation for approval would be in order. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.