My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-2017 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
10-16-2017 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2018 8:36:35 AM
Creation date
1/19/2018 8:36:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 16,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Hueler stated the fact of the matter is that on Pence Lane there is only one other property next to them, <br /> which could potentially be subdivided, but to say the variances being requested are justifiable is not <br /> accurate. Hueler noted they made repeated attempts to communicate with the Dunkleys as well as left a <br /> letter in their mailbox as a last ditch effort requesting a discussion about their continued concerns and <br /> received no response. Hueler indicated they then had to have their attorney write a letter, which was not a <br /> minor thing for homeowners who are not attorneys, and that they do not have the resources to deal with <br /> this type of a situation. Hueler stated it is a hardship to be engaging in this situation and that it is City's <br /> government's job to determine what is appropriate. <br /> Hueler stated they were unwilling to pay the lakeshore price the Dunkleys wanted for the lane and that <br /> they did not understand why the Dunkleys wanted them to pay for a lot that has no lakeshore access, no <br /> lakeshore view, and is not buildable at a price that included what the Dunkleys had paid for their <br /> lakeshore. Hueler indicated they had real estate people come out as well as appraisers to look at the land <br /> and that they told the Dunkleys they could not pay that much for the land. Hueler indicated they offered <br /> to buy a smaller section of the land, which was not acceptable to the Dunkleys, and that Mr. Dunkley told <br /> them the price was nonnegotiable. <br /> Greg Hueler stated Mr. Dunkley also said they would be paying for part of the retaining walls by the <br /> marsh and part of the driveway. When asked why they should pay for that,they were told it was <br /> nonnegotiable and communication ceased by the Dunkleys. <br /> Kelly Hueler stated they left on vacation over Labor Day and came home to a dramatically altered land. <br /> Hueler indicated they were not given any fair warning except for a demolition order for the home. Hueler <br /> stated when they arrived home, in their driveway was a large backhoe and a bobcat, with huge stumps and <br /> boulders pulled out of the lake area all the way down to the shore. Hueler indicated they called the City <br /> but someone had already called in and a stop work order had been issued. Hueler stated she could not get <br /> out of her driveway that morning to get to work and that the situation was very intimidating. Hueler <br /> stated the Dunkleys know they did not notify them about the work and that they are now in a situation <br /> where they are wondering how any project like this could get passed when citizens' rights are supposed to <br /> be equal. Hueler commented reasonable people can disagree but they need to follow the law and not <br /> thumb their noses at City ordinances and City Code. Hueler commented she is not sure what they are <br /> supposed to do as neighbors when they did what they did to the lakeshore. <br /> Greg Hueler stated their easement rights specifically state that 2710 and 2715 share the driveway and that <br /> additional homes cannot be added to that driveway without their cooperation. Hueler commented it is <br /> unfortunate they have to be here tonight. <br /> Kelly Hueler noted they did not say anything at the July meeting but that they tried to be neighborly and <br /> present a reasonable solution but they unfortunately have gotten nowhere. <br /> Thiesse asked if the easement document is still in flux. <br /> Greg Hueler indicated it is and that they do not expire. <br /> Kelly Hueler stated easements are legally recorded and are still in play. <br /> William Dunkley, Applicant, stated they did try to reach an agreement and that he offered the Huelers the <br /> land at the same price they paid for it. Dunkley stated while the Huelers were not purchasing lakeshore, <br /> they also were not buying marshland. Dunkley stated for the last month and a half their lawyers have <br /> Page 7 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.