My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-2017 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
08-21-2017 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2018 8:27:52 AM
Creation date
1/19/2018 8:27:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 21,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> 1. No structure may be closer than 75 feet to the lake on either side. <br /> 2. The property line between Lots 1 and 2 shall function as a side property line, requiring a 15-foot <br /> setback. <br /> 3. The applicant must comply with all comments of MCWD outlined in their memo of August 10, <br /> 2017. <br /> 4. The applicant should submit declaration and documentation of a wetland buffer as required by the <br /> MCWD. <br /> 5. All comments of the City Engineer outlined in a memo dated August 14,2017, shall be <br /> addressed. <br /> 6. Comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed. <br /> 7. Additional approvals include the following: <br /> a. Variance from the wetland setback. <br /> b. Variance of wetland buffer impact from the Watershed District. <br /> c. Conditional Use Permit for filling in the floodplain. <br /> d. Successful vacation of the existing driveway easement. <br /> e. Successful realignment of an underground utility easement. <br /> Landgraver stated to his recollection at the time of sketch plan review there was an issue with the view <br /> easement. Landgraver asked whether that was regarding Lot 2. <br /> Barnhart indicated it is. <br /> Landgraver asked if the location of the house on Lot 1 complies with the side lot setback. <br /> Barnhart stated the required setback is 10 feet and the plan is showing 16 feet. <br /> Lemke asked where the existing house is. <br /> Barnhart illustrated the location of Lots 1, 2, and 3 on the overhead as well as the existing home and <br /> garage. <br /> Lemke asked if the existing home would be set off from the proposed house. <br /> Barnhart indicated it appears to be close to the property line but that he does not know what that distance <br /> is. The proposed house shows a 16-foot setback. <br /> Thiesse asked if there are concerns with construction staging that would cause problems with the average <br /> lakeshore setback. <br /> Barnhart suggested the average lakeshore setback be identified as part of preliminary plat approval. If <br /> both of the new homes are at 75 feet,that would be the average lakeshore line on both sides. <br /> Page 10 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.