My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-2017 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
02-21-2017 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2018 4:06:49 PM
Creation date
1/18/2018 4:06:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,February 21,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The proposed cabin meets the 75-foot setback from the lake. The northern stoop access to the cabin is <br /> within the setback at 67 feet. An additional 61 square feet of hardcover is proposed within the 75-foot <br /> setback. The applicant is attempting to avoid impacting the existing extensive garden features on the <br /> property with the new cabin construction. <br /> Staff finds that the peninsula configuration of the property functions much like an island yet shares a 6- <br /> foot connection with the property across the bay at 2165 North Shore Drive dictating the average <br /> lakeshore setback requirement. The subject property does not block views of the lake from the home at <br /> 2165 North Shore Drive as it is across the water from the home. Staff finds the practical difficulty <br /> requirements are satisfied regarding the average lakeshore setback. <br /> The applicant has opted to modify the footprint and location of the guest cabin thereby triggering the need <br /> for the variances as well as the conditional use permit. Staff finds that the stoop on the north side of the <br /> home can be removed as there are three other points of egress. The proposed development suggests <br /> hardcover levels beneath the Tier 1 allowance and there is sufficient pervious area offering infiltration <br /> opportunities on the property. <br /> The conditions applying to the two different conditional use permits relating to the guest cabin have been <br /> satisfied according to Staff. The engineering standards required as part of the floodplain regulations <br /> apply to the conditional use permit for the structure and will be reviewed and applied at the permit stage. <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances and conditional use permits as follows: <br /> 1. Approval of the guest house conditional use permit with the standard covenants; <br /> 2. Approval of the conditional use permit to permit the guest house to be constructed on helical piers <br /> within the floodplain; and <br /> 3. Approval of the average setback variance for the construction of the new guest house cabin. <br /> The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br /> Laurel Ulland, Architect, stated she would be happy to answer any questions the Commission may have. <br /> Thiesse asked how far the proposed guest house would need to be moved to meet the 75-foot setback. <br /> Ulland stated she mistakenly read the ordinances as saying the house could be set at 75 feet without the <br /> stoop and that she would prefer not to move the house back. Ulland indicated she is attempting to set the <br /> south edge of the new house where the old house was as well as preserve the garden. Ulland stated they <br /> can give up the stoop if it is a concern. <br /> Thiesse stated unfortunately it will be a concern. <br /> Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. <br /> Thiesse commented the stoop was his main concern. <br /> Page 11 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.