Laserfiche WebLink
. , , <br /> �VO <br /> �l� ��.' �JCI�l�� <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CI'fY COUNCIL <br /> �`��,, �.�`� No. � 5 3 7 <br /> k xo� <br /> ! than the existing horne. <br /> 9). The variance to constnict an attached garage and 2 %z story additions tc the <br /> residence is in harrno�y with the general interrt and purpose of the Ordinanoe. <br /> h}, The varianoe#o permit improvements to the e�ossting residence in a residerrtial <br /> district is cansistent with the«�mmprehensiv�e plan. <br /> i)• The Applicants heve pr+ovided a survey reflecting the limited building en�ope <br /> an the Property which is substendard lot area and bt width establishing that <br /> � <br /> there are practic:al d'�f'iculties. <br /> j)• The Applicants propose to use the Prop�iy in a reasonable manner not <br /> permitted by the official c�ntrols; <br /> k). The circumstanoes unique to the Property were not created by the landowners. <br /> I). Approximately half of the existing home footprint e�asts in a nonoor�forming <br /> locabon; constn�cbon of a sacond story in a pertnitted location is limited by t�e <br /> � existing home.The proAosed Prolect wiN be cansisterrt with the r�ighborhood, <br /> and witt not adversely impact adja�nt lalceshore properties, <br /> ; m).The gra�ng of the proposed variano�wiU noi in ar�y way impair heatth�sefety, <br /> comfort or morels, or in arry other resped be c�ontrary #o the intent af this <br /> chapter. <br /> ' n)•,The grarrting of the requested yariances wili not merely serve as s oorn�ienoe <br /> to the Applicar�ts, but is necessery to alleviate demo�strabie diff`iculty. <br /> 4. Trie City Co�Jnal considered thk appiication at a meeting heid on Septerr�ber 14,2015 <br /> including the findings and reoommendations of the Planntng Commission� reports by <br /> ' CiiY staff, oonnments by the Applicents and the pubiic, and the e#fect of the proposed <br /> varianc�s on tfie health,safety and weifiare of the c�mmunity as woell as the impact on <br /> ! properti�in the�c�nity. <br /> i <br /> 5� The Ciiy Counal finds that the conditions exis�ng on this Prope�ty are peculiar to it ar� <br /> � do not appiy generally to other property in th� �oning district; that grantir� the <br /> i varianoes would not adversely affect treffic c�nditions, light, eir nor pose a flre hazard <br /> or other dar�er to neighboring property; would not merely senre as a oornenienoe to <br /> the 4wners, but is neoessary to aUeviate a practical difficulty; is n�ssary to pre�Ne <br /> , a substantial property right of the Applicants; and wouid be in keepir� with the spirit <br /> ' Page 3 of 6 <br />