My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-27-2017 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
11-27-2017 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2017 3:55:44 PM
Creation date
12/13/2017 3:55:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,November 27,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 9. PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN—Continued <br /> Printup stated he is a little hesitate about the trails given the number of other trails in the city and that he <br /> is not in favor of the boat for Big Island. <br /> Edwards indicated the City might have an option to partner on a boat with a sister city. <br /> Printup stated in his view the CIP is not over the top and that it would be nice to have some winter <br /> activities out at the golf course. <br /> The City Council took no formal acrion on this item. <br /> PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> 7. #17-3970—PAUL VOGSTROM ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, <br /> 209 WALTERS PORTS LANE,VARIANCES—RESOLUTION NO.6811 <br /> Printup stated his main point with the application is that there appears to be a pretty big difference <br /> between what was presented at the Planning Commission and what is now being proposed. Printup noted <br /> the Planning Commission appears to be supportive of this plan based on their past comments. <br /> Walsh stated he would like to understand what has changed from the last meeting to today. <br /> Curtis stated following the feedback received at the Planning Commission regarding all of their <br /> applications,the applicants took a step back and looked at their primary goal,which is to construct the <br /> addition onto their home. Curtis stated while the applicants have bigger plans for the property,they are <br /> now focused on the addition and have removed their plans for the third lot at this point. <br /> Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to basically maintain a Pence Lane driveway,a Walters Port <br /> driveway,and a Walters Port address. The addition will require a variance to the 75-foot setback and the <br /> average lakeshore setback,which will now be determined by the Hueller's home on the east and the house <br /> to the north. That setback line is completely behind the applicanYs home,so therefore the addition is <br /> completely ahead of it. <br /> In addition,the applicants will be submitting a restoration plan to address the work that was done in the <br /> 0-75 to remove vegetation. The retaining walls in that area are no longer being proposed. There is 130 <br /> square feet of additional structure within the 0-75 foot setback,which is the connection between the <br /> existing home and the addition. The applicants will also be enclosing the area where there is a hot tub <br /> and a deck. Curtis noted the addition will be primarily behind the 75-foot setback. <br /> Walsh stated he understands the issues with the connection and the hardship associated with that. <br /> Crosby asked if the applicants will be maintaining their Walters Port address. <br /> Curtis indicated they will be. <br /> Crosby asked if they will be selling off a portion of the second lot. <br /> Page 7 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.