My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
11-14-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 2:45:36 PM
Creation date
11/28/2017 3:30:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MO <br />boo <br />100 <br />u <br />R <br />too <br />Triclopyr far selective whole -bay milfoil management <br />—•— mea <br />O o sr4 <br />A\ <br />f b <br />t � <br />;1 <br />r � <br />Oay Po9WePtment <br />to <br />° <br />OW P°SIte-poant <br />l�9 <br />Figure 4. Tnelopyr concentrations measured following treatment of 50 he at 1500 µglL on Gideons Bay in June 2012. The left panel <br />represents sample sites where triclopyr was applied to larger treatment blocks The right panel represents sample sites In the middle of <br />bay outside of the treatment blocks (sites 9. 10, 11, and 12) and sites within a narrow treatment strip along an exposed shoreline <br />(sites 1 and 2). <br />sampling dates, the majority of the EWM detected was still <br />rated as 1 or 2 (Table 3). CLP showed an increase in fre- <br />quency (8 to 39%) from June 2011 to 2012, however, only <br />3 bites were rated as 3. Note that the 2012 treatment was <br />scaled back approximately 80% from the 2011 application. <br />This reduced treatment had little impact on EWM frequency, <br />qualitative ratings, or biomass from June to August 2012. <br />Native species in Gideom Bay that showed a negative re- <br />sponse to the bay -wide exposure in 2011 were Myrlophyl- <br />lum sibirzcum, E. candensis, and Z dubia (Table 6). High <br />frequency natives such as C. demersum, P. amplifolius, P. <br />zosteriformis, P richardsonii, and V. americana were not <br />impacted by the application. The lack of initial treatment <br />impact on P. zosteriformis in Gideons Bay contrasted with <br />observations from Grays and St. Albans bays, suggesting <br />that reduced bay -wide concentrations resulted in less overall <br />injury to this plant. The number of sample points with native <br />submersed plants in Gideons Bay remained stable through <br />the evaluation period. In addition, native plant frequency in <br />the littoral zone and species richness in Gideons Bay either <br />increased or were stable from 2011 to 2013 Gables 4 and 6). <br />Several sites in the bay near the 10 -foot contour supported <br />dense EWM or an EWM–C. demersum complex. Much of <br />the EWM recovery in this bay occurred in these deep water <br />off -shore areas (Fig. 5). <br />Plant biomass <br />Changes in overall plant biomass within each bay generally <br />trended toward a slight increase in total biomass between the <br />June and August of each year, regardless of whether man- <br />agement was implemented (Fig. 6). In contrast, the percent <br />of the biomass represented by EWM was highly reduced <br />for at least 2 seasons in all 3 bays following triclopyr treat - <br />meats gable 4). Although areduction in Grays Bay total bay <br />biomass was observed in 2012 between the June and August <br />evaluations, note that EWM biomass initially accounted for <br />64% of the biomass in the bay in June 2012 (Table 4), and <br />loss of EWM accounted for the majority of the reduction <br />in overall biomass. While frequency data suggested recov- <br />ery of EWM in the season following treatment, the biomass <br />data lagged behind frequency and remained low the sea- <br />son following a whole -bay triclopyr application (Table 4). <br />This finding was also reflected in the rake -toss ratings that <br />suggested values of 1 (small fragments) were often domi- <br />nant in lune of the season following a triclopyr application <br />(Table 3) <br />From a stakeholder perspective, the low biomass of EWM <br />and high frequency of ratings given a 1 in the season fol- <br />lowing treatment suggested that 2 years of EWM control <br />was achieved. Plant biomass was lower in June 2013 (native <br />plant frequency data were similar to prior years), suggesting <br />a delayed onset for sprouting and growth following a cool <br />spring in 2013. The biomass data refuted anecdotal claims of <br />decreased native plant abundance in relation to management <br />of EWM with low use rates of taclopyr. <br />Hydroacoustic transects <br />Data collected along hydroacoustic transects surveyed in <br />each bay during the June and August suggested a general <br />trend for increased submersed plant coverage and biovol- <br />ume (height in the water column) between June and August <br />of each year (Table 4). Notable exceptions included Grays <br />Bay in 2012 following the triclopyr treatment and the de- <br />creased biovolume in St. Albans between June and August <br />2012 in a year where no treatment was implemented. As <br />317 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.