My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
11-14-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 2:45:36 PM
Creation date
11/28/2017 3:30:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />McMillan noted she has not seen a landscaping plan and that this is a sensitive area. McMillan noted the <br />wetland buffer should not be disturbed even though there is buckthorn in there. <br />Walsh stated his recollection is that the residents were fine with leaving the buckthorn since it provides a <br />lot of screening. Walsh stated from his perspective, the neighbors' desires outweigh the need to get rid of <br />the buckthorn. <br />Levang noted the revised plan preserves 14 more trees and that the developer has been sensitive to the <br />desires of the residents. <br />Council Member Printup stated he would caution against leaving the buckthorn in this development since <br />the City would be opening itself up to having to allow buckthorn to remain on other properties. <br />Levang noted this is an RPUD and the City is allowed some flexibility. <br />John Stein, Charles Cudd Company, commented that there is currently a preserved buckthorn area in <br />Creekside that was done years ago. <br />Walsh stated when it comes to the issues of the residents, the Council needs to weigh which ones have <br />more weight. Walsh noted visibility is a big concern for the residents. <br />Printup stated he just wants the Council to be prepared to tell other people that they can leave the <br />buckthorn. Printup stated in his mind the Council is sending a mixed message by allowing the buckthorn <br />here to remain. <br />Levang commented since this is an RPUD, the City has a leg to stand on. <br />McMillan stated she is sensitive to the land clearing of this area since this lot was clear cut once in the <br />past. McMillan stated it is best over time that the buckthorn is removed and other vegetation planted and <br />that it will now be the homeowners who have to take that on. McMillan stated she does not want another <br />round of extensive clear cutting given the impacts on the area. <br />Printup stated it is setting the City up for other requests in the future. <br />Rick Denman, Charles Cudd, stated they have done a lot to keep the neighbors happy and that they have <br />taken steps to preserve as many trees as possible. Denman noted the neighbors are okay with leaving the <br />buckthorn but that he will leave the issue up to the City Council. <br />McMillan asked whether this is something that the homeowners association could address Iong-term. <br />Denman stated it would be hard for Charles Cudd to monitor it over time, but if the Council is open to <br />allowing the residents who move in here having an organized way to buffer the area, that could be an <br />option. <br />Printup stated the comment that the neighbors are okay with it implies that they do not care that it is in the <br />code. Printup questioned whether the City should eliminate it from the code and leave it up to individual <br />property owners. Printup stated he does not want to put a future Council in the position where this <br />situation is brought up. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.