My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
11-14-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 2:45:36 PM
Creation date
11/28/2017 3:30:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed <br />improvement and resulting setbacks appears to be consistent with the <br />character of the neighborhood. Homes on the west side of Crestview are <br />setback 25-32 feet, homes on the east side are setback 20-50 feet from <br />Crestview, with the subject parcel currently 57 feet, and proposed to be 41 <br />feet. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The existing home impacts the location of <br />future additions. The home is currently set back further than most other homes on <br />the street. <br />5. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The applicant suggests that the regulations, intended for 2 acre <br />lots, imposed on his lot create a practical difficulty. <br />6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed improvement for bedrooms <br />and a bathroom are reasonable in nature, and placement elsewhere on the lot does <br />not avoid a variance. <br />7. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. There is no <br />evidence to suggest the variance, if granted, would negatively impact the intent of <br />the zoning ordinances. <br />8. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The owner has been in the home <br />for 9 years, suggesting that the applicant has attempted to make do with the home <br />in its current state, and did not enter into the need for a variance frivolously or out <br />of convenience. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants <br />variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 and 78-1403 in order to allow the <br />construction of a new single family residence, subject to the following conditions: <br />1. Council approval is based on the survey/site plan and building plans submitted by the <br />Owners and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A and B. <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.