10-10-2016 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FILE # 16-3864 13 Sept 2016 Page 6 of 7 4. No future subdivision will be approved that places the structure within a lot that has no principal structure, except that the city in its subdivision approval may grant a finite time period in which the oversized accessory structure may remain without a principal structure, in order that a principal structure may be constructed. At the end of this time period, the oversized accessory structure must be removed if no principal structure has been constructed. 5. If the property is subdivided, the oversize accessory structure and principal structure will be located together within a lot that meets the minimum lot area requirement for the given size of accessory building. 6. In subdivision approval, the setback required for the oversize accessory structure shall remain. Septic System Status The property has been tested and viable septic sites have been located. The applicant is still developing a final plan to be reviewed by our Building Official prior to permitting. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties and Conditional Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the criteria permitting a guest house conditional use permit have been satisfied. Regarding the variance for the location of the guest house to be closer to the street than the principal structure, staff finds that the location makes sense. While technically the proposed use for the undeveloped property can be accomplished in keeping with the Code, the location shown is potentially the least impactful to adjacent properties. Engineer Comments The City engineer has performed a cursory review of the site plans and identified no immediate concerns. A comprehensive review of the plans will be conducted at the time of the building permit application. Public Comments The applicant has provided a list with signatures of supporting neighbors as well as supportive comments from both of the abutting neighbors on the north and south. The planning commission should note the comments attached as Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the CUP and variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested CUP and variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Commission Options for Consideration The Planning Commission may consider the following alternative motions: