Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 19, 2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />3. Rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. <br />Such covenant shall be binding on current and future property owners and shall be filed in the chain of <br />title of the property. <br />Thiesse asked whether the City has a standard form relating to the covenant. <br />Curtis indicated standard language would be included in the language of the resolution. <br />Peter Bluth, Applicant, stated they removed the bathroom due to cost and then put it back in. Bluth stated <br />they would like to improve the functionality of the garage. <br />Thiesse asked if the size of the room is the same. <br />Curtis stated the room size is consistent with what was originally shown but the bathroom fixtures had <br />been removed. <br />Thiesse commented it appears the room is large enough for a bathtub. Thiesse asked if the applicant <br />plans to come back later to request a bathtub. <br />Bluth stated that is just the way the room fits in the building and that he has no intention of putting in a <br />bathtub. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. <br />Schwingler moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3851, <br />Peter Bluth, 2413 Carman Street, granting of a setback variance and to allow plumbing within the <br />existing nonconforming oversized accessory structure subject to Staff recommendations. <br />VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />3. #16-3859 ROBERT GUMNIT AND FRANCES GRAHAM, 1100 OLD CRYSTAL BAY <br />ROAD SOUTH, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:36 P.M. — 6:39 P.M. <br />Robert Gumnit, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated the owners of the property would like to modify the existing two-story tack building to <br />include a full bathroom so that it can serve as a caretaker's quarters. According to the code, it would be <br />considered a guest house. The property consists of over nine acres in area, so therefore a guest house is <br />permitted via a guest house conditional use permit. <br />The lot is considered a lakeshore property. Therefore the location of the tack building between the home <br />and the street is conforming. The guest house would be within the 999 square foot building footprint and <br />the required setbacks are also conforming. <br />