Laserfiche WebLink
�o�o <br /> C ITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��q �G~� N�. — `-� � (� � <br /> kESH�� <br /> lot line; and the orientation in reladonship to the neighboring home to the immediate east; <br /> are all practical dif�culties that make it impossible to reconstruct the existing home and <br /> conshuct the proposed addifions meeting all code requirements. All of these circumstances <br /> pre-dated the Applicant's interest in the property and were not created by the Applicant. <br /> Further,the proposed reconstruction and additions only mazginally expand the house outside <br /> its existing footprint height, and granting the variances will not result in a home that is out of <br /> character with the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> B4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic <br /> considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br /> B5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequa.te access to direct sunlight <br /> for solaz energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br /> defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br /> 78." This condition is not applicable. <br /> B6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not pennitted under <br /> Orono City Code Chapter 78 for properry in the zone where the affected person's land is <br /> located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family residence with <br /> accessory buildings is an allowed use in the LR-1 C District. <br /> B7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br /> as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. <br /> B8. "T'he special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiaz to such <br /> property or immediately adjoining properly." The condition of a small, cflnstrained <br /> lakeshore lot is common in Orono,but compared to many others, this lot due to its size and <br /> orientation to the lakeshore when reviewed in conjunction with the existing side and street <br /> setbacks indicate that the e�sting footprint location is optimum for the site and represents <br /> the most appropriate location for reconstruction of the eacisting residence. <br /> B9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the <br /> land is located." The condition of a sxnall, constrained lakeshore lot is common in Orono, <br /> but compared to many others, while this lot is confornung in width, it has only a minimal <br /> buildable area as compared to other lots which are deeper and have more flexibility. The <br /> property has an existing home similar in size and shape to the proposed replacement home; <br /> the property is uniquely situated as compared to others in the area. <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />