My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#6119-variances-2012
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
3520 North Shore Drive - 08-117-23-43-0009
>
Resolutions
>
#6119-variances-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:47:41 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 2:14:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3520
Street Name
North Shore
Street Type
Drive
Address
3520 North Shore Dr
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0811723430009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� o� <br /> O O CITY of ORONO <br /> , <br /> � u ;�., � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �� ' . �G� No. � 1 1 9 <br /> �kEsHog' <br /> 4. The Property is only 49 feet wide which makes expansion of the home within required <br /> setbacks difficult. <br /> 5. The prominent lakeshore for properties in this neighborhood is south of County Road 51 <br /> (North Shore Drive), which dictates that garages are best located on the northern portion <br /> of properties to allow for m�imization of lake views from within the home. <br /> 6. The Property is a double frontage lot, and the proposed attached garage on the northern <br /> part of the home is closer to Balder Park Road than the County Road, so the proposed <br /> driveway connection to Balder Park Road will limit overall hardcover necessary for <br /> driveway purposes while simultaneously eliminating a private access point onto the <br /> County Road in accordance with general access management guidelines. <br /> 7. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on February <br /> 21, 2012 and unanimously recommended approval of the requested variances based on <br /> the following findings: <br /> a. Residential use of the Property is appropriate given the existing use, the <br /> comprehensive plan and zoning allowances. <br /> b. The request to expand the existing home to a size allowed by code within allowable <br /> setbacks is a reasonable proposal that would otherwise be prohibited by official <br /> controls as the resulting hardcover is prohibited. <br /> c. The Applicants were not responsible for the location of the existing home or the <br /> grossly nonconforming lot width of the Property which together dictate how and <br /> where the existing dwelling can be e:cpanded. <br /> d. The use of the Property will not be changing and therefore will not alter the essential <br /> character of the locality. <br /> e. The Applicants are not proposing to construct the proposed additions solely for <br /> economic considerations. <br /> f. The small width of the lot, the location of the prominent lakeshore on the primary <br /> street-side of the home, the presence of duel 0' — 75' zones on the northern and <br /> southern portions of the lot, and the fact that the Property is a double frontage lot are <br /> unique circumstances differentiating the Property from others within the City of <br /> Orono. <br /> Page2of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.