My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6806
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 6800 - 6899 (October 23, 2017 - September 24, 2018)
>
Resolution 6806
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2018 11:29:53 AM
Creation date
11/14/2017 11:59:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 6806 <br />4. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: <br />a. Variance to permit the construction of a sign wider and thickness and width to be located <br />within the 10 yard front yard setback. <br />5. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the <br />health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and <br />air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding <br />area. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicable <br />regulation provides for commercial signage in a manner that does not impact the traveling <br />public due to hindered visibility and visual clutter. Further, the ordinance intends on <br />improving the streetscape by requiring more stable, architecturally significant monument <br />signs in lieu of pylon signs. The variances, if granted, would protect visibility while providing <br />signage similar to monument signs. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the <br />subject parcel as commercial, the proposed signage supports and is consistent with the <br />intended use. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by <br />the official controls; The use of the property is a financial institution. Freestanding <br />signage is a normal and expected accessory structure in commercial settings. The <br />proposed signage, to be located in a conforming location, would require the removal <br />of several parking spaces, possible increasing hard cover. Further, the sign as <br />proposed replaced one in this same location for several decades. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lot was <br />developed in the 1970s, and has been a bank for many decades. The siting of the <br />building and the parking lot was established by previous developers; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Recognizing that signage <br />is a normal improvement in a commercial setting, the proposed signage is intended to <br />compliment the improvements being made on the principal structure while <br />maintaining site visibility at the intersections. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as <br />follows: <br />4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property <br />or immediately adjoining property. The pattern of development in this area has resulted in <br />buildings and parking areas very close to the traveled portion of the road, this is unique to <br />this neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.