Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,October 9,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 12. #17-3968 SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY OB/O FREDERICK AND PATRICIA <br /> JOHNSON, 1565 ORCHARD BEACH PLACE (PID 07-117-23-0026)—VARIANCE—Continued <br /> Seals stated theoretically, if there was something there before on the property, it was not 25 feet tall and <br /> probably one story. Seals stated the proposal is not in like and kind since it is two-story with a deck on <br /> top. <br /> Curtis stated the applicants are also not proposing to build in like and kind. <br /> Crosby stated he is concerned about the setbacks. <br /> Walsh stated the applicant is requesting variances to lot area, lot area,rear setback,and average lakeshore <br /> setback. Walsh stated the Council already knows that the average lakeshore setback is not on this <br /> property so the applicant cannot meet it no matter what happens and that the City typically approves lot <br /> width and lot area. Walsh stated the rear setback is different and that typically nobody gets to be closer <br /> than 10 feet from the side yard setback. Walsh stated in this situation he views the rear setback as being <br /> similar to the side setback and that in his view ten feet is the basic minimum. <br /> Curtis noted given the recent code amendment allowing the 10 percent width,the applicants are <br /> conforxning with an 8.3 foot setback. Curtis stated 10 feet is pretty common but that this lot is afforded <br /> the flexibility of that setback if treating it like a side setback. <br /> Walsh stated lot area and lot width variances are pretty much granted in the City and that the applicants <br /> cannot meet the average lakeshore setback. Walsh stated in his view the rear setback is the issue. <br /> Seals commented she struggles with this lot because it seems like a bad idea. Seals noted she understands <br /> the point about Crystal Bay but that the other homes in the area are already there. <br /> Walsh stated this is similar to Rest Point Lane that had a lot with a .22 acre lot on the corner with similar <br /> issues. <br /> Crosby stated the setbacks were not this bad. <br /> Seals stated it seems like it is being stretched in this case but that she does not want to say nothing can be <br /> built on the lot. <br /> Crosby stated he would like to hear from the person who purchased the lot. <br /> Frederick Johnson,property owner, stated he purchased the property in 2013 and he was told it was a <br /> residential lot of record and that it had a sewer stub to the property. Johnson indicated it had a house at <br /> some point and a full garage that was torn down within the past 20 years. <br /> Crosby asked if the realtor told him it was a buildable lot. <br /> Johnson stated the realtor never said it was a buildable lot. Johnson indicated he has built on lots in the <br /> Crystal Bay neighborhood that were 50' x 80' or 4,000 square foot lots with 2,000 square foot building <br /> pads. Johnson stated he is now looking at a 10,000 square foot lot and he is having a hard time getting <br /> 1,400 square feet. Johnson stated he is willing to pull it back to meet the 10-foot back yard setback. <br /> Page 12 of 23 <br />