Laserfiche WebLink
. � � ---� <br /> �.�'\ <br /> � <br /> � O :, O <br /> � ��:���A� CITY of ORONO <br /> I � ��������� � <br /> � �� � �c"`� � RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> '� '; '•4�''' ��r �j,, G�' <br /> � ������ � / <br /> �`4 �' � 4�/ NO. 3064 <br /> kESIIO <br /> 6. After the Planning Coaunission meeting, applicant <br /> proceeded to construct a garage without final Council <br /> approval or the necessary building permit. During that <br /> construction, the roof line was reversed so that run- <br /> off will be directed towards the westerly neighboring <br /> property which is only 3' from the garage wall and less <br /> than 2' f rom the roof overhang. <br /> 7. The garage as constructed is 21' x 32', or 672 s.f. in <br /> f ootprint area, requiring 10' setbacks f rom both the <br /> south and west lot lines. The garage was constrncted <br /> 14' from the south lot line and 3.3' from the west lot <br /> line. The site plan with the garage as constructed <br /> yields 75-250' hardcover of 50.6$, with lot coverage by <br /> structures of 16.7$. <br /> 8. The City Council reviewed the "as-built" site plan at <br /> the November 12, 1991 Council meeting, and voted 5 to 0 <br /> to table the request, directing applicant to meet with <br /> staff to consider other options. <br /> 9. At the January 13, 1992 Council meeting, Council <br /> reviewed a number of alternative proposals resulting in <br />� various degrees of variance to the performance <br /> standards of hardcover, lot coverage, and setback. On <br /> a vote of 4 to 0, Council conceptually granted a <br /> hardcover variance to allow 50.6$ hardcover in the 75- <br /> 250' zone, 16.3$ Iot coverage by structures , and <br /> denying the requested west side setback variance, based <br /> on the following findings: <br /> , A. No suitable hardship is demonstrated for al lowing <br /> the substandard side setback for this illegally <br /> constructed garage. <br /> i B. If the west end of the garage is remov ed ta the <br /> i 10' setback line, the remaining 21' x 25' garage <br />� results in a final lot coverage of 16.3 $, a <br />' decrease of 1.2$ from the pre-existing 17.5$ lot <br />� conerage by structures. <br /> Page 3 of 9 _ <br />