Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Gaffron <br /> From: Peter W. Johnson [peterj@peterwjohnson.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:15 PM <br /> To: Mike Gaffron <br /> Subject: Re: Bluff Review for Morries <br /> Mike, Thanks. The Shoreland Overlay extends 1000 feet from the shoreline and provides in part: <br /> SeC. 78-1285. Vegetation alterations. (b) Intensive vegetation clearing within 75 feet of the shoreline, on <br /> steep slopes or within the bluff impact zone within the Shoreland Overlay District is prohibited. Limited clearing of <br /> shrubs and trees less than six inches in diameter and cutting, pruning and trimming of trees of any size is allowed <br /> to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to accommodate the placement of permitted <br /> stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted lockboxes, <br /> provided that the screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, <br /> leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced. <br /> (Ord. No. 101 2nd series, § 1(10.56(16)(I)), 2-24-1992; Ord. No. 127 2nd senes, § 7, 7-11-1994) <br /> Steep slope means lands having average slopes of 12 percent or greater as measured over horizontal <br /> distances of 50 feet or more, that are not bluffs. <br /> Intensive vegetation clearing means the complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, strip, <br /> row or block. <br /> In the area of 3165 NSD that exceeds a 12% slope, Morrie has a number of damaged and sickly trees. <br /> Some of the trees are in the fill area. Others are just in the wrong place or have been trimmed to protect overhead <br /> powerlines for so long that they've got a bizzare shape. Could you or Melanie meet me and out there to see what <br /> amount of clearing would be tolerated? Let me know. <br /> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Mike Gaffron <MGaffron(a�ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: <br /> Peter— <br /> See attached sketch. I looked at three different transects on the two properties. First established the toe of bluff <br /> per definition; then established the top of bluff per definition; then calculated slope (rise over run) for a)the <br /> entire distance from toe to top; and b) the distance from toe to 955' (which is approximately the point 25' <br /> above the OHWL). In no case did the calculated slope get to more than 25%. We do not consider short <br /> segments of>30% slope as defining a bluff—it has to be based on the average of toe to top and/or toe to the 955 <br /> contour. <br /> Unless the topo you are working from is significantly different from that in our GIS system, it appears you do <br /> not have a bluff to deal with. <br /> i <br />