Laserfiche WebLink
. . � <br /> Michael 8� Donna Wallace Public Hearing Memo, 414/03, Page 3 <br /> Minnetonka and authorized temporary dock extensions beyond the dock use area. In 1991,the Board <br /> adopted Resolution 73 that allowed temporary dock extensions without a permit application. In <br /> Resolution 73, it encouraged residents of two or more adjoining sites to combine their authorized dock <br /> use areas for a single common dock, for their respective non-commercial private use, subject to no more <br /> than four restricted being stored at such a dock without a multiple dock license. Code Section 1.02, <br /> subd. 2 defines a multiple dock or mooring area as "any dock or mooring area constructed or maintained <br /> for the storage of five or more restricted watercraft, other than commercial docks". <br /> In previous discussions with the applicant and on-site observations for the variances granted to the <br /> west, more than four restricted watercraft have been parked at the common dock for the Wallace and <br /> Blomberg properties. Staff has communicated to the applicant and Blombergs that the single common <br /> dock is allowed by Code. However, the storage of four or more restricted watercraft at this dock needs <br /> to be in compliance with Code Section 2.02 and it requires a multiple dock license in order to do so. The <br /> applicant has requested the Board to evaluate the possibility of amending this Code provision that <br /> requires this. <br /> In compliance with MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, the MN DNR and the City of Orono were provitled a copy <br /> of the proposed variance application on 3/27/03, with comments due in the District office by 4/7/03. The City of <br /> Orono has commented that Orono Code will not require a Joint Use Dock License because"Joint Use"is defined <br /> as more than two adjacent riparian owners sharing in the use of a single dock. Staff has not received feedback <br /> from the MN DNR on the proposed variance application. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff has the following recommendations or comments: <br /> • The Board could direct the District attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the dock <br /> length variance application, subject to the dock use area complying with minimum side setback <br /> requirements. This Order should take into consideration whether a shared dock, as proposed by the <br /> applicant, should be allowed at the Wallace and Blomberg properties. <br /> Y - . _ .�. _ , . ��� :c _�:.� . __ �:° . „ � ;u�„_... _. �..;.:.,:.' :,':,;,�, :�, t"e �" :.;;uce �r�d 8.;,..`�rg <br /> properties, that would store more than four restricted watercraft, should require a multiple dock license. <br /> Any changes would require a Code amendment and it might be appropriate to delegate discussion of this <br /> Code provision to the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee because of the precedent in could <br /> set on a lakewide basis. In the meantime, no more than four restricted should be stored at this common <br /> dock unless a multiple dock license application has been received and approvetl by the Board. <br />