My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#3631-variances-1995
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
3135 North Shore Drive - 09-117-23-32-0018
>
Resolutions
>
#3631-variances-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:50:20 PM
Creation date
10/25/2017 9:49:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3135
Street Name
North Shore
Street Type
Drive
Address
3135 North Shore Dr
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0911723320018
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� O� <br /> O O <br /> ��t CITY of ORONO <br /> ,� � � <br /> '� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��9kESH��'�G NO. a� 6 e`3 1 <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 16, 1995 <br /> and recommended approval of the renewal variance application as proposed, based <br /> on the following unique findings and hardships: <br /> A. 80% of the total property is unbuildable. <br /> B. The original structure was placed on property in 1973 prior to current <br /> lakeshore setback standards. <br /> C. The majority of the existing house is located within the 0-75' setback area. <br /> D. The interior lagoon connected to main lake by a dredQed channel is <br /> considered gart of the main lake placing greater setback restrictions on <br /> building envelope. <br /> E. The current proposal involves decreases in hardcover within the 0-75' and <br /> 75-250' setback areas as follows: <br /> In the 0-?5' setback area there is a 499 s.f. or 1.7% reduction and in the <br /> 7�-250' setback area there is a 1,889 s.f. or 14% reduction. <br /> 4. The Cit�� Council fmds that the conditions existing on this properry are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br /> and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The Cin� Council has considered this renewal application includinQ the findin�s and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the communiry. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.