Laserfiche WebLink
Clt� of O �. <br /> .� �� . � <br /> �� ���� <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CI��� ��� <br /> • <br /> NO. 2065 �� <br /> • - • • <br /> C) The applicant's contractor removed a 72 s.f. concrete <br /> patio in the 0-75' setback zone and replaced it in the same <br /> general location with a 144 s.f. wooden deck in Spring 1986, <br /> without obtaining the necessary approvals or permits. The <br /> deck is located 25' from the lakeshore. The deck <br /> construction results in a net increase of 72 s.f. of 0-75' <br /> hardcover, or an increase to 11.50$. <br /> D) The applicant is requesting approval for a balcony <br /> extension on the second f�oor between existing balconies <br /> serving the master bedroom and screen porch, all within the <br /> 0-75' setback zones. The entire proposed balcony extention <br /> is above existing hardcover consisting of rock beds under- <br /> lain by plastic, hence no increase from pre-existing hard- <br /> cover will result from the proposed balcony. The balcony <br /> extention Wi1 i provide a secondary fire exit from the master <br /> bedroom. <br /> E) The property contains a large square footage of rock <br /> beds underlain by plastic in the 0-75' zone, from which the <br /> plastic can be removed to compensate for the increased deck <br /> hardcover. <br /> 4. The City Counci 1 f inds that the rock beds under lain by <br /> plastic within the property constitute excessive and unneccessary <br /> hardcover in an amount of approximately 2,375 s.f. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including <br /> the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br /> reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect <br /> of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the <br /> community. <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br /> property in this zoning district; that granting the variance <br /> would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would <br /> not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br /> applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br /> the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />