Laserfiche WebLink
(4) Uses without wafer-orienfed needs. Uses without water-oriented needs must be located on lots <br /> or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, <br /> must either be set back double the normal ordinary high water level setback or be substantially <br /> screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf-on <br /> conditions. <br /> (5) Fences, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall be placed within the shore setback zone. Portions <br /> of dock located landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject to the regulations <br /> for landings per section 78-1282. Retaining walls shall not be placed within the shore setback zone. <br /> (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the <br /> lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent <br /> lots; except that this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump <br /> houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not <br /> apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most <br /> lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. <br /> a. In instances where the average lakeshore setback can not be met, administrative <br /> approval may be granted at the discretion of the planning director provided no lake views <br /> of an adjacent lakeshore lot are obstructed and adjacent neighbors provide written <br /> approval. <br /> (Ord. No. 101 2nd series, § 1(10.56(16)(C)), 2-24-1992;Ord. No. 11 3rd series, § 1, 5-24-2004;Ord. No. 106 3rrl series, § <br /> 28, 6-10-2013) <br /> Melanie Curtis � 952.249.4627 � mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us <br /> From: Gustafson, Sven [mailto:Sven@stonewood.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 6:51 AM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis <br /> Cc: David Eggert <br /> Subject: Kallas - 3048 North Shore Drive <br /> Melanie - <br /> See attached. The landscaper is of the opinion that you told him last fall/early winter, that if the deck is on <br /> grade, it is acceptable and does not need additional permitting, variance. He believes the same holds for the <br /> hot tub - per a conversation with you. <br /> Can you confirm this? We'd be building the deck within 12" of grade, and the hot tub would sit on the grass, <br /> and be movable. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Sven <br /> J. Sven Gustafson <br /> 3 <br />