Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Gaffron <br /> From: Kent Hodder[kent@methodder.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 12:51 AM <br /> To: Mike Gaffron <br /> Cc: Christine Mattson; Dave Pemberton <br /> Subject: 2640 North Shore Drive/Zoning Application#12-3559 <br /> Attachments: admin@ci.orono.mn.us_20120531_093255.pdf <br /> Hi Mike, <br /> I received the request for more information to complete the application for the variance <br /> consideration for the building of an accessory building on my residential property today. <br /> While I think I understand the spirit of the request and the fact that the city's intent is to <br /> enforce the rules for the good of the city and it's residents and the community as a whole, I <br /> am hoping there is another way to accommodate those goals. <br /> To fulfill what I and the survey company believed to be the requested documentation, I have <br /> already spent a great deal of mo�ey towards this variance process. As far as I can tell, the <br /> only reason I even need a variance is because the rules don't take into account that although <br /> my home is 2/10 of a mile from the street, and since I don't live on a waterfront- I must <br /> request a variance to construct the accessory building between my home and the street- <br /> despite the logical nature of my placeme�t request based upon the long narrow nature of my <br /> 3.5+ acres. <br /> While disappointing, this makes some sense that I am getting snagged by a rule desig�ed to <br /> prevent issues that wouldn't necessarily take situations like mine into account. I understand <br /> it's the way these things work. <br /> But what I don't understand is the need to do these additional survey details on the entire <br /> property when only a portion seems impacted by my proposed accessory building. I've been <br /> told that this detail is going to drive my survey investment even higher and likely miss the <br /> application deadli�e. <br /> I understand that my survey company is surprised too, as they tried to be thorough in what <br /> they produced - including discussing the project with the city prior to doing the current <br /> survey work. <br /> Dave Pemberton, the surveyor from Sathre- Bergquist in Wayzata, is planning to contact <br /> your department today and see if there is a way to accomplish what the planning department <br /> i <br />