Laserfiche WebLink
, ' 4 � <br /> information but were modified by the draftsman as the final design aesthetic was not yet determined. <br /> Since this was only a matter of aesthetics he did not feel it was important. The eventual design of the <br /> entry was discussed with Lyle and Willie prior to erection, with handrails installed to meet their <br /> requirements. The entry was completed late September, the building as stated above was not <br /> completed until November 1, again adequate time for the city to raise any issues. Willie and I stood <br /> on this entry as he approved the final inspection. The only remaining item is to remove temporary <br /> storage building by June 1, 2014. If required Kent will pay the surveyor to add the front entrance to <br /> the as-built, but it seems unnecessary when it is obviously located at the front door. <br /> Kent is very conscientious about the environment, the improvements he has made to his property to <br /> solve chronic drainage issues around house, retain runoff water for watering, prairie restoration, wild <br /> flowers, geothermal, electrical load control program, etc. are good for the environment, good for <br /> Orono, and an good example to other citizens. Orono should reward this type of behavior, not hinder <br /> it. Sec. 86-68 (3) allows for the Building Official to exempt the as-built requirements and this would be <br /> a good time for such an exemption. I ask on Kent's behalf that Orono grant him this exemption and <br /> release the escrow. <br /> Thank you for your consideration <br /> Ron Hall <br /> 612-868-1165 <br /> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Christine Mattson<CMattson(a�ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: <br /> Kent, <br /> City Engineer, Jesse Struve, reviewed the photos submitted by Mr. Hall, please see his comments below. <br /> On the proposed survey submitted with the project, a driveway was shown. The survey dated 8/8/13 does not <br /> show a driveway. The photos Mr. Hall submitted show a driveway and a front entry/bridge constructed. The <br /> front entry/bridge was not part of the original permit approvals and therefore was constructed without permits; <br /> further it is not shown on the survey. <br /> z <br />