Laserfiche WebLink
� . <br /> a nonbuildable lot (no primary structure) . " The planning <br /> commission denied respondents ' proposal and the city council passe�. <br /> a resolution citing the following reasons for denial : <br /> (A) The lack of the principal structure means that there <br /> is no individual responsible for protecting the dock nor <br /> the boats maintained at that dock. <br /> (B) A19607 dock] locatedronTTra�tSFn] already has a dock <br /> [the <br /> (C) The property is not wide enough to provide adequate <br /> parking. * * * <br /> (D) Approval of the use of an accessory structure such as <br /> a dock, without a p-rincipal structure wouid zstablish a <br /> negative precedent in dealing with a similar requests for <br /> lots of similar size . <br /> Respondents later sent a memo to the city council, outlining <br /> the concerns the city council expressed and suggesting a different <br /> proposal that they thought would satisfy those concerns . <br /> Respondents proposed conveying some property to Tillotson to <br /> provide him legal access to the lake, and building a single common <br /> dock to be shared by Tillotson, Peterson, and Stodola . <br /> At a city council meeting, the council denied the shared dock <br /> proposal . At a later meeting, the council adopted a resolutivn <br /> denying the shared dock proposal . The resolution indicated that : <br /> Council refused to accept the interpretation <br /> of the acceasorycantssbaseduon the f llowing <br /> proposed by pp <br /> findings : <br /> (A) The City has never credited a preliminary <br /> structure on an adjacent property to allow <br /> accessory uses or structures on lots that did <br /> not sustain principal residences . <br /> (B) The credit of the principal residence fdr� <br /> ' � ` an accessory use/structure• serving an adjacent <br /> proper.ty will establish a negative precedent <br /> � -3- <br />