#3653-approving plat-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

J � • � � O� O O �, CITY of ORONO �ti �.� � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � l �G �3653 9kESH�g' NO. VVHEREAS, Lots 1-4 and Scotch Pine Lane will be replatted into three building lots and a private driveway outlot, with lot areas as follows: Proposed Lot 1 = 1.13 acres (Marfield) Proposed Lot 2 = 0.85 acres (Hill) Proposed Lot 3 = 1.34 acres (± 0.96 acres dry) (Toles) Outlot A = 0.05 acres; and �'VHEREAS, as a result of the replat, each of the three proposed lots increases in acreage gained from the vacation of Scotch Pine Lane, and in t�ie case of progosed �,ot 2, also resulting from the addition of area incoiporated within the existing Lot 2. Each of proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3 will, however, remain at lot areas less than the required two acre minimum for the LR- lA Zoning District, requiring a lot area variance; and WHEREAS, each of proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3 are lakeshore lots but lack the required 200' lot width at the shoreline and at the 75' lakeshore setback Iine as required in the LR- lA district, requirin� lot width variances for each of Lots 1, 2 and 3; and �'�'I�REAS, proposed Lots 2 and 3 both abut North Shore Drive, a platted Counry road. Proposed Lot 1 as a result of the replat will no longer abut a public roadway, but will gain access via a shared driveway servinJ proposed Lots 1 and 2 within proposed Outlot A. By definition, proposed Lot 1 is a "back lot" per Municipal Subdivision Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 2. Per Section 11.31, Subdivision 5 (C-2), proposed Lot 1 is required to meet 1509 of the two acre zoning district lot area requirement; is required to meet the 200' lot width requirement at the shoreline, at the lakeshore setback line, and at the street yard setback line; is subject to a street ��ard or front yard depth of 150% of the 50' front yard requirement of the LR- lA district; and is subject to a side yard depth of 150% of the 30' LR-lA side yard requirement; and «'HEREAS, as a result of the replat, the M�eld property (proposed Lot 1) becomes a back lot �•ith 4�' required side setbacks rather than the 30' side setbacks normall�� required in the LR-lA district, mal:ing more of Marfield's residence structure non-conformina to the side setback requirements. Similazly, the Hill properly (proposed Lot 2) becomes a front lot subject to a �0' side sveet setback alona Outlot A, and 30' side setback along the common boundary line �tiith proposed Lot 1. The replat results in revised setback requirements impacting proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3, ��hich must be taken into account in future improvements to those properties; Page 2 of 6